Electrochemical Gaseous Carbon Monoxide Reduction Using Cu Nanoparticles in Acidic Electrolytes
Ryo Kurihara,Kaito Nagita,Keitaro Ohashi,Takashi Harada,Shuji Nakanishi,Kazuhide Kamiya
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/ma2023-02472399mtgabs
2023-12-22
ECS Meeting Abstracts
Abstract:The electrochemical CO 2 reduction reaction (CO 2 RR) into value-added multi-carbon products (C 2+ ), using renewable electricity is an attractive strategy for closing the carbon cycle. Electrolysis of gaseous CO 2 using a gas diffusion electrodes (GDEs) enables electrolysis at high current density 1 , and various studies are being conducted for its practical application 2 . Multi-carbon compounds (ethylene, ethanol, acetic acid and n-propanol) can be obtained electrochemically from CO 2 using only Cu-based electrocatalysts. CO 2 RR measurements using Cu-based catalysts have generally been performed in neutral-alkaline electrolytes because the competing H 2 evolution reaction (HER) can be suppressed. However, CO 2 is easily converted to inert (bi)carbonate, which migrates to an anode compartment or is discharged at the outlet of a cathode compartment, and thus, there is a drawback in neutral and alkaline electrolytes from the point of view of substrate utilization efficiency 3 . Therefore, efficient CO 2 RR using acidic solutions has been required. In recent years, although several studies on CO 2 reduction under acidic conditions have been reported 4 , the requirements for C 2+ formation in acidic electrolytes are still uncovered. Direct CO electrolysis is more desirable than CO 2 electrolysis for studying CO dimerization to C 2+ in acidic electrolytes because a constant amount of CO can be supplied to the catalytic surfaces, and local pH variations due to CO 2 dissolution can be eliminated. However, compared to CO 2 RR in acidic solutions, the CO reduction reaction to C 2+ in acidic electrolytes has been little studied. In this work, we quantitatively study the CO reduction reaction (CORR) to C 2+ products in an acidic solution through experimental gaseous CO electrolysis and multiphysics simulation of the local pH. We used Cu nanoparticles (CuNPs) as catalysts, which are commonly used in CO 2 RR. CuNPs were synthesized using a chemical reduction method using NaBH 4 as the reductant. The oxidation state of copper nanoparticles is Cu(II), confirmed by XPS and XRD. A catalyst ink was prepared by dispersing 1.7 mg CuNPs in 2.2 μL 5 wt% Nafion solution and 600 μL iso-propanol. 80 μL ink was added dropwise onto the GDE. For CORR measurements, a home-made three-compartment electrochemical cell was employed. A solution of pH 2.0 (0.5 M H 3 PO 4 0.5 M KH 2 PO 4 1.5 M KCl) and pH 1.0 (1.0 M H 3 PO 4 2.0 M KCl) were used for the catholyte. Gas and liquids products were quantified by gas chromatography and 1 H-NMR, respectively. A reaction-diffusion model based on Nernst-Planck equation was used to simulate the local pH using COMSOL Multiphysics software. A one-dimensional model was used with a diffusion layer of 100 μm. For simplicity, only proton-consuming reactions were considered. Phosphate equilibrium reactions were introduced. Electrochemical CO reduction was performed in acidic solutions. Hydrogen evolution was dominant at low current densities (below 50 mA/cm 2 ) in both pH 1.0 and 2.0 solutions. The C 2+ production became dominant at 200 mA/cm 2 , and its faradaic efficiency was almost equivalent to that of neutral and alkaline solutions. We assumed that the suppression of hydrogen evolution was due to the increase in pH at the electrode surface with increasing current density. Therefore, we calculated the local pH by multiphysics simulation. The surface pH suddenly increased to about 13 at 200 mA/cm 2 at pH 2.0. Taking into account these results, the selectivity of C 2+ increased with increasing pH on the electrode surface. At the conference, we will also present the effect of surface cations on CORR. References [1] A. Inoue, T. Harada, S. Nakanishi, K. Kamiya, EES Catal. , 2023 , 1, 9 [2] K. Kamiya, K. Fujii, M. Sugiyama, S. Nakanishi, Chem Lett. , 2021 , 50, 166-179 [3] Gu. J., Liu. S., Ni. W., Ren. W., Haussener. S., Hu. X., Nat.Catal., 2022 , 5, 268–276 [4] J. E. Huang, F. Li, A. Ozden, A. S. Rasouli, F. P. G. de Arquer, S. Liu, S. Zhang, M. Luo, X. Wang, Y. Lum, Y. Xu, K. Bertens, R. K. Miao, C. T. Dinh, D. Sinton and E. H. Sargent, Science , 2021 , 372, 1074 -1078 Figure 1
English Else