Thermodynamic and Kinetic Competition between C–H and O–H Bond Formation Pathways during Electrochemical Reduction of CO on Copper Electrodes

Shi-Qin Xiang,Jun-Lin Shi,Shu-Ting Gao,Wei Zhang,Liu-Bin Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c05472
IF: 12.9
2021-02-09
ACS Catalysis
Abstract:Carbon monoxide is the key intermediate in the electrochemical CO<sub>2</sub> reduction reaction and determines the overpotentials and selectivities for C<sub>1</sub> and C<sub>2</sub> products on copper electrodes. The kinetic model based on Marcus charge transfer theory was applied to understand the competing C–H and O–H bond formation pathways involved in the CO reduction reaction on different facets of copper. The electrochemical reduction of CO adopts a thermodynamics-controlled CHO* pathway on Cu(110) and Cu(211) surfaces, and it follows a kinetics-controlled COH* pathway on Cu(111) and Cu(100) surfaces. It was found that the initial competing hydrogenation of CO to produce the CHO* or COH* intermediate plays an important role in determining the catalytic activity and selectivity. The simulated potential-dependent rate constant profiles show that the catalytic activity increases as Cu(111) &lt; Cu(110) &lt; Cu(211) &lt; Cu(100). We suggest that catalyst structure engineering, aiming to decrease the onset potential of the COH* pathway with a lower reaction activation barrier, could be an effective way to promote the electrocatalytic activity of the CO reduction reaction.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acscatal.0c05472?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.0c05472</a>.Microkinetic model; comparing the reaction barrier of chemical one-proton–one-electron hydrogenation reactions computed by the CI-NEB method and Marcus theory; optimized adsorption configurations of CO*, CHO*, and COH* on different surfaces of copper electrodes; potential-dependent reaction barrier of reactions 1a and 1b occurring on different surfaces of the copper electrode; comparison of reaction free energies of CHO* and COH* formation with different explicit solvation models; and computed changes of free energy, reorganization energy, and the reaction barrier of elementary hydrogenation reactions on the Cu(100) surface (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acscatal.0c05472/suppl_file/cs0c05472_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
chemistry, physical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?