Abstract:Importance: Women are underrepresented at higher ranks in academic medicine. However, the factors contributing to this disparity have not been fully elucidated. Implicit bias and unconscious mental attitudes toward a person or group may be factors. Although academic medical centers use physician trainee evaluations of faculty to inform promotion decisions, little is known about gender bias in these evaluations. To date, no studies have examined narrative evaluations of medical faculty by physician trainees for differences based on gender. Objective: To characterize gender-associated linguistic differences in narrative evaluations of medical faculty written by physician trainees. Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study included all faculty teaching evaluations completed for the department of medicine faculty by medical students, residents, and fellows at a large academic center in Pennsylvania from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016. Data analysis was performed from June 1, 2018, through July 31, 2018. Main outcomes and measures: Word use in faculty evaluations was quantified using automated text mining by converting free-text comments into unique 1- and 2-word phrases. Mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was performed to assess associations of faculty gender with frequencies of specific words and phrases present in a physician trainee evaluation. Results: A total of 7326 unique evaluations were collected for 521 faculty (325 men [62.4%] and 196 women [37.6%]). The individual words art (odds ratio [OR], 7.78; 95% CI, 1.01-59.89), trials (OR, 4.43; 95% CI, 1.34-14.69), master (OR, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.69-10.63), and humor (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.44-3.73) were significantly associated with evaluations of male faculty, whereas the words empathetic (OR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.56-12.07), delight (OR, 4.26; 95% CI, 1.35-13.40), and warm (OR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.83-6.49) were significantly associated with evaluations of female faculty. Two-word phrases associated with male faculty evaluations included run rounds (OR, 7.78; 95% CI, 1.01-59.84), big picture (OR, 7.15; 95% CI, 1.68-30.42), and master clinician (OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 1.21-13.36), whereas evaluations of female faculty were more likely to be associated with model physician (OR, 7.75; 95% CI, 1.70-35.39), just right (OR, 6.97; 95% CI, 1.51-32.30), and attention (to) detail (OR, 4.26; 95% CI, 1.36-13.40). Conclusions and relevance: The data showed quantifiable linguistic differences between free-text comments about male and female faculty in physician trainee evaluations. Further evaluation of these differences, particularly in association with ongoing gender disparities in faculty promotion and retention, may be warranted.

Advancing the science of health professions education through a shared understanding of terminology: a content analysis of terms for “faculty”

No common understanding of profession terms utilized in health services research : An add-on qualitative study in the context of the QUALICOPC project in Austria

Cross-sectional analysis reveals increased use of nonspecific terminology in reference to women dermatologists in patient reviews at academic centers

Taxonomy of teaching methods and their use in health professions education: a scoping review protocol

Assessment of Gender-Based Linguistic Differences in Physician Trainee Evaluations of Medical Faculty Using Automated Text Mining

Diversity in health professional education scholarship: a document analysis of international author representation in leading journals

Anatomical and medical terminology: new challenges and perspectives

The Distinctions Between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework

Bringing conceptualizations of the health advocacy competence across the continuum of medical education together: a scoping review protocol

Advanced practice nursing: A concept analysis

Can AnatomicalTerms.info with its synonyms and succinct open definitions be a solution to address variations in usage of anatomical terminology?

Magnitude of terminological bias in international health services research: a disambiguation analysis in mental health

Culinary Medicine or Culinary Nutrition? Defining Terms for Use in Education and Practice

Evaluating Expert-Layperson Agreement in Identifying Jargon Terms in Electronic Health Record Notes: Observational Study

Identifying Troublesome Jargon in Biology: Discrepancies between Student Performance and Perceived Understanding

Writing administrative staff back in: a Foucauldian-inspired discourse analysis of power relations in a faculty of medicine

Terminologia Anatomica 2nd edition: perspectives from anatomy educators in the United Kingdom

A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms

Medical student exposure to women’s health concepts and practices: a content analysis of curriculum at Canadian medical schools

Sending messages: How faculty influence professionalism teaching and learning

How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals