Abstract:Background: Health research that significantly impacts global clinical practice and policy is often published in high-impact factor (IF) medical journals. These outlets play a pivotal role in the worldwide dissemination of novel medical knowledge. However, researchers identifying as women and those affiliated with institutions in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) have been largely underrepresented in high-IF journals across multiple fields of medicine. To evaluate disparities in gender and geographical representation among authors who have published in any of five top general medical journals, we conducted scientometric analyses using a large-scale dataset extracted from the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), The British Medical Journal (BMJ), The Lancet, and Nature Medicine. Methods: Author metadata from all articles published in the selected journals between 2007 and 2022 were collected using the DimensionsAI platform. The Genderize.io API was then utilized to infer each author's likely gender based on their extracted first name. The World Bank country classification was used to map countries associated with researcher affiliations to the LMIC or the high-income country (HIC) category. We characterized the overall gender and country income category representation across the medical journals. In addition, we computed article-level diversity metrics and contrasted their distributions across the journals. Findings: We studied 151,536 authors across 49,764 articles published in five top medical journals, over a long period spanning 15 years. On average, approximately one-third (33.1%) of the authors of a given paper were inferred to be women; this result was consistent across the journals we studied. Further, 86.6% of the teams were exclusively composed of HIC authors; in contrast, only 3.9% were exclusively composed of LMIC authors. The probability of serving as the first or last author was significantly higher if the author was inferred to be a man (18.1% vs 16.8%, P < .01) or was affiliated with an institution in a HIC (16.9% vs 15.5%, P < .01). Our primary finding reveals that having a diverse team promotes further diversity, within the same dimension (i.e., gender or geography) and across dimensions. Notably, papers with at least one woman among the authors were more likely to also involve at least two LMIC authors (11.7% versus 10.4% in baseline, P < .001; based on inferred gender); conversely, papers with at least one LMIC author were more likely to also involve at least two women (49.4% versus 37.6%, P < .001; based on inferred gender). Conclusion: We provide a scientometric framework to assess authorship diversity. Our research suggests that the inclusiveness of high-impact medical journals is limited in terms of both gender and geography. We advocate for medical journals to adopt policies and practices that promote greater diversity and collaborative research. In addition, our findings offer a first step towards understanding the composition of teams conducting medical research globally and an opportunity for individual authors to reflect on their own collaborative research practices and possibilities to cultivate more diverse partnerships in their work.

Diversity in health professional education scholarship: a document analysis of international author representation in leading journals

Faster, higher, stronger – together? A bibliometric analysis of author distribution in top medical education journals

Does diversity beget diversity? A scientometric analysis of over 150,000 studies and 49,000 authors published in high-impact medical journals between 2007 and 2022

Scientific production in sexual and reproductive health and rights research according to gender and affiliation: An analysis of publications from 1972 to 2021

Persistent ethnic disparities in authorship within top European and North American medical journals: a serial cross-sectional analysis

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion on Editorial Boards of Medical Student Journals

How do we understand the determinants of health? An exploration of distributed knowledge and interprofessional health sciences education

Gender and geographic representation in editorial boards of education journals

How global is global health research? A large-scale analysis of trends in authorship

Gender and Geographical Representation on Editorial Board Members of Medical Informatics Journals

An international study of diversity in occupational therapy research– A bibliographic review of English research literature

Authorship inequalities in global health research: the IeDEA Southern Africa collaboration

Global evidence of gender equity in academic health research: a scoping review

Publishing priorities in global health: A framework and empirical analysis

Disparities in Global Authorship and Data Source in the Pediatric Blood and Cancer Journal 2011–2021: Realities and Strategies for Improvement

Underrepresentation of Low- and Middle-Income Nations in Ophthalmology Journals: A Critical Analysis on Diversity, Equity, and Global Representation

Twelve tips for strengthening global equity in health professions education publication

Evaluation of Low- and Middle-Income Country Authorship in the Global Orthopaedic Literature

Equity and Representation in Cardiology Research: A Comprehensive Analysis of Authorship from Low and Low-Middle income countries in Cardiology Journals

Cultural diversity and inclusion in UK medical schools

Enablers and barriers to engaging under-served groups in research: Survey of the United Kingdom research professional's views