Abstract:For seismic random noise attenuation, deep learning has attracted much attention and achieved promising performance. However, compared with conventional methods, the denoising performance of supervised learning-based methods heavily depends on massive training samples with high-quality labeled data, which makes their generalization capabilities limited. Even though deep neural networks (DNNs) usually outperform the conventional denoising methods, their performance is not guaranteed since neural networks still lack good mathematical interpretability at present. To alleviate the dependency on labeled data and explore insights into the denoising system, we proposed an unsupervised denoising method based on model-based deep learning, which combined domain knowledge and a data-driven method. We designed a network based on the modified iterative soft threshold algorithm (ISTA), which omitted the soft threshold to alleviate uncertainties introduced by empirically selected thresholds. In this network, we set the dictionary and code as trainable parameters. A loss function with a smooth penalty was designed to ensure that the network training can be implemented in an unsupervised manner. In the proposed method, we set the denoised result by <span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="5.449ex" height="2.509ex" style="vertical-align: -0.671ex;" viewBox="0 -791.3 2345.9 1080.4" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-66" x="0" y="0"></use> <use xlink:href="#MJMAIN-2212" x="772" y="0"></use> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-78" x="1773" y="0"></use></g></svg></span> deconvolution as the input for our network, and the further denoised data can be obtained after each epoch of the training, which means that our method does not need the testing procedure. Experiments on synthetic and field seismic data demonstrate that our method exhibits competitive performance compared to the conventional, supervised, and unsupervised methods, including <span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="5.449ex" height="2.509ex" style="vertical-align: -0.671ex;" viewBox="0 -791.3 2345.9 1080.4" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-66" x="0" y="0"></use> <use xlink:href="#MJMAIN-2212" x="772" y="0"></use> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-78" x="1773" y="0"></use></g></svg></span> deconvolution, curvelet, the Denoising Convolutional Neural Network (DnCNN), and the integration of neural network and Block-matching and 3-D filtering method (NN + BM3D).<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="display: none;"><defs id="MathJax_SVG_glyphs"><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-66" d="M118 -162Q120 -162 124 -164T135 -167T147 -168Q160 -168 171 -155T187 -126Q197 -99 221 27T267 267T289 382V385H242Q195 385 192 387Q188 390 188 397L195 425Q197 430 203 430T250 431Q298 431 298 432Q298 434 307 482T319 540Q356 705 465 705Q502 703 526 683T550 630Q550 594 529 578T487 561Q443 561 443 603Q443 622 454 636T478 657L487 662Q471 668 457 668Q445 668 434 658T419 630Q412 601 403 552T387 469T380 433Q380 431 435 431Q480 431 487 430T498 424Q499 420 496 407T491 391Q489 386 482 386T428 385H372L349 263Q301 15 282 -47Q255 -132 212 -173Q175 -205 139 -205Q107 -205 81 -186T55 -132Q55 -95 76 -78T118 -61Q162 -61 162 -103Q162 -122 151 -136T127 -157L118 -162Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMAIN-2212" d="M84 237T84 250T98 270H679Q694 262 694 250T679 230H98Q84 237 84 250Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-78" d="M52 289Q59 331 106 386T222 442Q257 442 286 424T329 379Q371 442 430 442Q467 442 494 420T522 361Q522 332 508 314T481 292T458 288Q439 288 427 299T415 328Q415 374 465 391Q454 404 425 404Q412 404 406 402Q368 386 350 336Q290 115 290 78Q290 50 306 38T341 26Q378 26 414 59T463 140Q466 150 469 151T485 153H489Q504 153 504 145Q504 144 502 134Q486 77 440 33T333 -11Q263 -11 227 52Q186 -10 133 -10H127Q78 -10 57 16T35 71Q35 103 54 123T99 143Q142 143 142 101Q142 81 130 66T107 46T94 41L91 40Q91 39 97 36T113 29T132 26Q168 26 194 71Q203 87 217 139T245 247T261 313Q266 340 266 352Q266 380 251 392T217 404Q177 404 142 372T93 290Q91 281 88 280T72 278H58Q52 284 52 289Z"></path></defs></svg>

The Denoising Based on the Fusion Method of Kalman Filter and EMD

DENOISING METHOD BASED ON WAVELET TRANSFORM COEFFICIENT CORRELATION AND LOCAL LAPLACIAN MODEL

Seismic data denoising based on mixed time-frequency methods

RANDOM NOISE REDUCTION USING A HYBRID METHOD BASED ON ENSEMBLE EMPIRICAL MODE DECOMPOSITION

The LiDAR Echo Denoising Algorithm Based on EMD and FFT

Random Noise Attenuation by F-X Empirical-Mode Decomposition Predictive Filtering

Random noise attenuation by f-x spatial projection-based complex empirical mode decomposition predictive filtering

Random Noise Attenuation by A Selective Hybrid Approach Using F - X Empirical Mode Decomposition

A data-driven approach for denoising GNSS position time series

Correcting noisy dynamic mode decomposition with Kalman filters

A simple method inspired by empirical mode decomposition for denoising seismic data

Research on a Noise Reduction Method Based on Multi-Resolution Singular Value Decomposition

Improved random noise attenuation using f − x empirical mode decomposition and local similarity

Removal of multisource noise in airborne electromagnetic data based on deep learning

Video denoising based on a spatiotemporal Kalman-bilateral mixture model

A Morphology Filter-Assisted Extreme-Point Symmetric Mode Decomposition (MF-ESMD) Denoising Method for Bridge Dynamic Deflection Based on Ground-Based Microwave Interferometry

Lidar Signal Subsection Denoising Based on Multi-Dimension EMD

A diffusion model-based framework USDDM for random noise elimination of seismic signal

Learning From Noisy Data: An Unsupervised Random Denoising Method for Seismic Data Using Model-Based Deep Learning

An Adaptive Denoising Method Based on Local Mode Estimation.

New algorithm of multiscale decomposition and estimation for single sensor and single model