Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to use the case of York University in Canada to analyze the connection between University Social Responsibility and voluntary disclosure. The authors examine whether the university's voluntary air emissions disclosure is performative by exploring whether York University's espoused commitment to its community stakeholders truly guides its incentive to disclose carbon emissions in the absence of a legal mandate. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative exploratory study uses a post-humanistic approach to build on publicly available data on key measures and metrics of air quality and carbon emissions to facilitate our understanding of representational and interventionist uses of measurement models by social actors and their basis for making voluntary disclosures. Findings York University linked the logic of capital markets with sustainability disclosures as an incentive for managing the cost of long-term debt. This paper contributes to measurement practice of sustainability disclosure by reinforcing the practice-theoretic conception of measurement that questions the independent nature of objects measured from the measurement methods and reporting tools. Practical implications The findings of this study are important to higher education administrators, regulators and policymakers, as they offer a strategic guide for the assessment of reports on an organization's commitment to sustainability and in determining the efficacy of voluntary reporting to community stakeholders in general although they are intended for specific groups. Originality/value Using York University as an illustrative case, the authors argue that air emissions per se are not a reality that shapes decisions at the organizations; instead, the intra-action of air emissions measurement, communications and operational investments define the reality where sustainability is advanced. Specifically, the authors find that the performative effects of emissions disclosure may be associated with socially desirable outcomes in terms of social responsibility and concrete financial rewards.

Trustworthy or misleading communication of voluntary carbon offsets in the aviation industry

Voluntary carbon offset programs in aviation: A systematic literature review

Understanding the Acceptance of Carbon Offset Programs among Hospitality Consumers: an Application of the Extended Parallel Process Model

Designing Trustworthy User Interfaces for the Voluntary Carbon Market: A Randomized Online Experiment

“More than words”: Expanding the taxonomy of greenwashing after the Volkswagen scandal

The Uneven Returns of Transparency in Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosures

The benefit of virtue signaling: Corporate sleight-of-hand positively influences consumers' judgments about "social license to operate"

Marketing sustainable tourism: the role of value orientation, well-being and credibility

Navigating Carbon Offsetting: How User Expertise Influences Digital Platform Engagement

Assessing audit impact and thoroughness of VCS forest carbon offset projects

Strong transparency required for carbon credit mechanisms

TrueBranch: Metric Learning-based Verification of Forest Conservation Projects

Online travel reviews as persuasive communication: The effects of content type, source, and certification logos on consumer behavior

Caught in between: credibility and feasibility of the voluntary carbon market post-2020

A corpus-based analysis of potential linguistic indicators of corporate deception in tobacco industry documents.

The market for carbon offsets: insights from US stock exchanges

Sustainability marketing myopia

Carbon emissions measurement as intra-action: incentives to disclose air emissions at a Canadian university

Are Words Commensurate with Actions? Quantifying Commitment to a Cause from Online Public Messaging

A qualitative meta-analysis of carbon offset quality criteria

Demand for low-quality offsets by major companies undermines climate integrity of the voluntary carbon market