Abstract:Food consumers often query or ignore the risk assessments of scientists, the food industry and public bodies. This is widely acknowledged. It has been suggested that this ‘expert-lay discrepancy’ is a relatively straightforward upshot of the fact that lay people lack the knowledge and technical understanding of experts. However, much published research on risk in psychology and sociology runs counter to this ‘knowledge deficit’ model (Hansen et al., 2003). In many cases, at least, lay risk assessments are not well explained as the product of ignorance, because they are in fact complex, situational sensitive expressions of a person's value system. There is obviously a pressing need today to understand expert-lay discrepancies in the assessment of food risks. We need to know how consumers perceive and assess risks; why they respond to communication and advice relating to those risks in the way they do; what factors affect their willingness to trust public institutions responsible for regulating the food industry and issuing guidance on food matters; and what determines their handling of specific food hazards. Psychometric and psychological studies of risk perception offer an invaluable corrective to excessive and simplistic reliance on the deficit model (Fife et al., 2000; Hansen et al., 2003). By emphasising the multi-dimensionality of lay risk perception, they have improved the understanding of expert-lay discrepancy. More generally, the demonstration that risks and benefits are not perceived independently of each other is a crucial finding of psychological research, and we now know that risk-benefit analyses that treat risk and benefits as independent factors should be handled with caution by those aiming to interpret or influence popular opinion. Our paper is an attempt to analyse consumers’ behaviour when facing a potential risky action such as consuming GM food. The hypothesis tested states that consumers take into account both costs (accident) and benefits (rewards) of uncertain outcomes and then minimize risk instead of trying to totally avoid it. A sample of 338 students, interviewed in year 2000 (188) and in year 2008 (150), enrolled in different Italian colleges was directly interviewed on an hypothetical genetically modified tomato market. A mixture distributions was used first for inferring on what variables influence the decision to take part on the "new market" proposed and, second, to estimate the Willingness To Pay (WTP) distribution for those willing to buy the GM product proposed.

EFFECTS AND VALUE OF VERIFIABLE INFORMATION IN A CONTROVERSIAL MARKET: EVIDENCE FROM LAB AUCTIONS OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD

Mobilising the Public to Fight Poverty Using Anti‐poverty Labels in Online Food Markets: Evidence from a Real Experimental Auction

Consumers’ valuation for cultured meat: a multi-city choice experiment in China

Willingness to Pay versus Willingness to Vote: Consumer and Voter Avoidance of Genetically Modified Foods

Amount of Information and consumers' willingness to pay for food traceability in China

Consumers' Trust in Government and Their Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Food: Empirical Evidence from China

Consumers' Risk Perception and Willingness to Pay for Abnormally Shaped Vegetables in China

Effects of Food Additives Information on Consumers’ Risk Perceptions and Willingness to Accept: Based on a Random Nth-Price Auction

Measuring specialty crop grower willingness to pay for genetic modification and genetic editing

Consumer intention to purchase GM soybean oil in China: effects of information consistency and source credibility

Psychological determinants of willingness to taste and purchase genetically modified food

The Economics of Genetically Modified Crops

Consumers, GMOs and Label:An Empirical Analysis

How to Improve Risk Perception Evaluation in Food Safety: A Psychometric Approach

Consumer Welfare and GM Food Labeling: A Simulation Using an Adjusted Kumaraswamy Distribution

Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information.

Awareness, Acceptance of and Willingness to Buy Genetically Modified Foods in Urban China

Myths and Realities about Genetically Modified Food: A Risk-Benefit Analysis

The landscape of online news regarding genetically modified foods: A cross-sectional study

Consumer acceptance and valuation of quality‐improved food products derived by genome editing technology. A case study of rice in Vietnam

A comparison of EU and US consumers' willingness to pay for gene-edited food: Evidence from apples