Abstract:Technical governance refers to governing activities in which scientific and technological advances are systematically applied for a more efficient functioning of society, especially in the political and economic spheres. Technical governance models are shaped by the cultural, political and social aspects of regions and countries. The national response to COVID-19 has highlighted differences between these models. For China, the theory of technical governance was of great importance in the modernization of society. It is a specific field of study in contemporary China and part of the philosophy of technology. This paper presents a way to rethink the contradictions between scientism and anti-scientism. Scientism claims that scientific and technological progress has reasonable foundations and strengthens the position of science. Anti-scientism criticizes science and technology and sees them as a threat to the modern world. The so-called “reconsideration approach” is not about finding a compromise, but about critically integrating these opposing views in order to build a theory of technical governance. Reconsideration approach is a deliberative, historical and concrete scientific study. In this context, the word “deliberative” means a multilateral view when addressing issues of science and technology policy. The term “historical” rejects the only true definition of technology and indicates that it changes over time. The word “specific” refers to an assessment of technical issues that should be considered in a specific context, taking into account differences between countries, regions, groups and participants. Through the reconsideration approach, technical governance can respond to the challenges created by emerging technologies. A good technology governance model should not only describe the mechanism for integrating new technologies into society but also correctly combine human and technical factors, taking into account the national context of the country. Thus, the reconsideration approach for technical governance is a dynamic theory that responds to new technological challenges.

Re‐examining the reform of China's science and technology system: a historical perspective

A Historical Perspective of China's Innovation System Reform: a Case Study

China's R&D internationalization and reform of science and technology system

Reforming China's S&T System

Science and technology policy reform and its impact on China's national innovation system

Marketization, globalization and administrative reform in China: a zigzag road to a promising future

The Review and Outlook for Scientific and Technological Information Undertaking of China

The “Reconsideration Approach” to Technical Governance: a Study in China’s Context and the Post-Pandemic Era

The Influence of Education and Scientific Research System on China's Science and Technology Innovation Capability

Perspective of Technological Innovation and Technology Management in China

“System” and “function” of Structural Reforms of Science and Technology——a Thinking of Structural Reforms of Science and Technology in China

A retrospective analysis of China's science and technology evaluation policy since 1978

S&T Policy Evolution: A Comparison Between the United States and China (1950-Present)

A bibliometric study of China’s science and technology policies: 1949–2010

The evolution of China's National Energy RD&D Programs: The role of scientists in science and technology decision making

The 1998 Administrative Reform in China: Issues, Challenges and Prospects

Reflections on STS in Mainland China: A Historical Review

China’s Scientific and Technological Innovation Strategy under the New Pattern of Development

Domestic Reform and Global Integration: Public Administration Reform in China over the Last 30 Years

Balancing Local Concerns and Global Views: Western Administrative Theory in China’s Reform Practices

Guan-hua Xu: China's move toward being a country of innovation