Abstract:Biological systems differ from the inanimate world in their behaviors ranging from simple movements to coordinated purposeful actions by large groups of muscles, to perception of the world based on signals of different modalities, to cognitive acts, and to the role of self-imposed constraints such as laws of ethics. Respectively, depending on the behavior of interest, studies of biological objects based on laws of nature (physics) have to deal with different salient sets of variables and parameters. Understanding is a high-level concept, and its analysis has been linked to other high-level concepts such as “mental model” and “meaning”. Attempts to analyze understanding based on laws of nature are an example of the top-down approach. Studies of the neural control of movements represent an opposite, bottom-up approach, which starts at the interface with classical physics of the inanimate world and operates with traditional concepts such as forces, coordinates, etc. There are common features shared by the two approaches. In particular, both assume organizations of large groups of elements into task-specific groups, which can be described with only a handful of salient variables. Both assume optimality criteria that allow the emergence of families of solutions to typical tasks. Both assume predictive processes reflected in anticipatory adjustments to actions (motor and non-motor). Both recognize the importance of generating dynamically stable solutions. The recent progress in studies of the neural control of movements has led to a theory of hierarchical control with spatial referent coordinates for the effectors. This theory, in combination with the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis, allows quantifying the stability of actions with respect to salient variables. This approach has been used in the analysis of motor learning, changes in movements with typical and atypical development and with aging, and impaired actions by patients with various neurological disorders. It has been developed to address issues of kinesthetic perception. There seems to be hope that the two counter-directional approaches will meet and result in a single theoretical scheme encompassing biological phenomena from figuring out the best next move in a chess position to activating motor units appropriate for implementing that move on the chessboard.

La conducta de los organismos: Un análisis experimental

Estudio introductorio a La conducta de los organismos

Pavlov in America: a heterodox approach to the study of his influence

The roles of the analogy with natural selection in B.F. Skinner's philosophy

A molar view of goal direction and habit

A Multiscale View of Verbal Behavior

Self-Organization and Information Processing: From Basic Enzymatic Activities to Complex Adaptive Cellular Behavior

The contribution of physiological psychology.

Inhibition and Impulsivity: Behavioral and Neural Basis of Response Control

Creating a strategy for progress: A contextual behavioral science approach

LATENT SUBSTRATES OF COMPULSIVITY AND BEHAVIOURAL FLEXIBILITY

Theoretical Behaviorism, Economic Theory, and Choice

Meeting of minds: Skinner and Michotte at the International Congress of Psychology, Stockholm, 1951

Conditioning Conformity: A Neuroscientific Funding and Publishing Paradox

Machine psychology: autonomous behavior, perceptual categorization and conditioning in a brain-based device

Fantastic beasts and how to study them: rethinking experimental animal behavior

A Multiscale Sensorimotor Model of Experience-Dependent Behavior in a Minimal Organism

The nervous system as a solution for implementing closed negative feedback control loops

Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias

Understanding and Synergy: A Single Concept at Different Levels of Analysis?

Interfacing behavioral and neural circuit models for habit formation