Diastolic function grading by American Society of Echocardiography guidelines and prediction of heart failure readmission and all‐cause mortality in a community‐based cohort

Steven J. Lavine,Ghulam Murtaza,Zia Ur Rahman,Danielle Kelvas,Timir K. Paul
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.15206
2021-09-23
Echocardiography
Abstract:BackgroundDiastolic function (DF) guidelines have been simplified but lack extensive outcome data. Using a rural university heart failure (HF) database, we assessed whether DF grading could predict HF, HF readmission, and all-cause mortality (ACM). MethodsIn this single-center retrospective study that included 613 patients in sinus rhythm hospitalized for HF (HF with preserved—254 patients, with mid-range—216 patients, and reduced ejection fraction—143 patients), we recorded demographics, Doppler-echo, Framingham HF score, laboratories, HF readmission, and ACM with follow-up to 2167 days. ResultsDiastolic dysfunction (Ddys) parameters (left atrial volume index [LAVI] > 34 ml/m2, tricuspid regurgitation [TR] velocity > 2.8 m/sec, and E/e' > 14) had moderate sensitivity (46.2%–65.0%) for predicting HF among all phenotypes combined with DF grading having moderate predictability and additive to a clinical composite for HF prediction (AUC = .677, P  34 ml/m2: HR 1.56 [1.26–2.19]; E/e' > 14: HR 1.44 [1.21–1.99]; TR > 2.8 m/sec: H1.43 [1.19–1.88]; LV Dys grade II: HR 2.12 [1.42–2.96]; LV Ddys grade III: HR 2.39 [1.57–4.82]). ConclusionThe findings of this study highlight the clinical and prognostic relevance of determining the severity of LV Ddys in patients with HF with regard to HF verification and HF readmission.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?