Abstract:Background: Evaluating left ventricular diastolic function (LVDF) is crucial in echocardiography; however, the complexity and time demands of current guidelines challenge clinical use. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based framework for automatic LVDF assessment to reduce subjectivity and improve accuracy and outcome prediction. Methods: We developed an AI-based LVDF assessment framework using a nationwide echocardiographic dataset from five tertiary hospitals. This framework automatically identifies views, calculates diastolic parameters, including mitral inflow and annular velocities (E/A ratio, e' velocity, and E/e' ratio), maximal tricuspid regurgitation velocity, left atrial (LA) volume index, and left atrial reservoir strain (LARS). Subsequently, it grades LVDF according to guidelines. The AI-framework was validated on an external dataset composed of randomly screened 173 outpatients who underwent transthoracic echocardiography with suspicion for diastolic dysfunction and 33 individuals from medical check-ups with normal echocardiograms at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, tertiary medical center in Korea, between May 2012 and June 2022. Additionally, we assessed the predictive value of AI-derived diastolic parameters and LVDF grades for a clinical endpoint, defined as a composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure, using Cox-regression risk modelling. Results: In an evaluation with 200 echocardiographic examinations (167 suspected diastolic dysfunction patients, 33 controls), it achieves an overall accuracy of 99.1% in identifying necessary views. Strong correlations (Pearson coefficient 0.901-0.959) were observed between AI-derived and manually-derived measurements of diastolic parameters, including LARS as well as conventional parameters. When following the guidelines, whether utilizing AI-derived or manually-derived parameters, the evaluation of LVDF consistently showed high concordance rates (94%). However, both methods exhibited lower concordance rates with the clinician's prior assessments (77.5% and 78.5%, respectively). Importantly, both AI-derived and manually-derived LVDF grades independently demonstrated significant prognostic value [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) =3.03; P=0.03 and adjusted HR =2.75; P=0.04, respectively] for predicting clinical outcome. In contrast, the clinician's prior grading lost its significance as a prognostic indicator after adjusting for clinical risk factors (adjusted HR =1.63; P=0.36). AI-derived LARS values significantly decreased with worsening LVDF (P for trend <0.001), and low LARS (<17%) was associated with increased risk for the clinical outcome (Log-rank P=0.04) relative to that for preserved LARS (≥17%). Conclusions: Our AI-based approach for automatic LVDF assessment on echocardiography is feasible, potentially enhancing clinical diagnosis and outcome prediction.

Prognostic Significance of the Left Ventricular Diastolic Score: A Project Baseline Health Study

Prognostic Relevance of a Score for Identifying Diastolic Dysfunction according to the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging Recommendations in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

A machine learning-derived risk score to predict left ventricular diastolic dysfunction from clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

Diastolic function grading by American Society of Echocardiography guidelines and prediction of heart failure readmission and all‐cause mortality in a community‐based cohort

Diastolic dysfunction and survival in patients with preserved or mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

A novel echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction score can identify hemodynamic severity profiles in left ventricular dysfunction

Prognostic Significance of Echocardiographic Measures of Cardiac Remodeling

Redefining diastolic dysfunction grading: combination of E/A ≤0.75 and deceleration time >140 ms and E/ε' ≥10

Prognostic significance of exercise stress echocardiography using two and three diastolic variable approaches

Comparing left atrial indices by CMR in association with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and adverse clinical outcomes

Prognostic Importance of Left Ventricular Mechanical Dyssynchrony in Predicting Cardiovascular Death in the General Population

Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden

A clinical score for predicting left ventricular reverse remodelling in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

Left Atrial Reservoir Strain-Based Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Grading and Incident Heart Failure in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction

Full and simplified assessment of left ventricular diastolic function in covid‐19 patients admitted to ICU: Feasibility, incidence, and association with mortality

Prognostic Implications of LV Strain Risk Score in Asymptomatic Patients With Hypertensive Heart Disease

Novel Biomarkers of Grade I Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease

Prognostic stratification of patients with mitral regurgitation using artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiogram for left ventricular diastolic function assessment

Left atrioventricular coupling index: association with diastolic dysfunction and prognostic implications in heart failure patients

Artificial intelligence-enhanced automation of left ventricular diastolic assessment: a pilot study for feasibility, diagnostic validation, and outcome prediction