Abstract:BackgroundSystematic literature searching is recognised as a critical component of the systematic review process. It involves a systematic search for studies and aims for a transparent report of study identification, leaving readers clear about what was done to identify studies, and how the findings of the review are situated in the relevant evidence.Information specialists and review teams appear to work from a shared and tacit model of the literature search process. How this tacit model has developed and evolved is unclear, and it has not been explicitly examined before.The purpose of this review is to determine if a shared model of the literature searching process can be detected across systematic review guidance documents and, if so, how this process is reported in the guidance and supported by published studies.MethodA literature review.Two types of literature were reviewed: guidance and published studies. Nine guidance documents were identified, including: The Cochrane and Campbell Handbooks. Published studies were identified through ‘pearl growing’, citation chasing, a search of PubMed using the systematic review methods filter, and the authors’ topic knowledge.The relevant sections within each guidance document were then read and re-read, with the aim of determining key methodological stages. Methodological stages were identified and defined. This data was reviewed to identify agreements and areas of unique guidance between guidance documents. Consensus across multiple guidance documents was used to inform selection of ‘key stages’ in the process of literature searching.ResultsEight key stages were determined relating specifically to literature searching in systematic reviews. They were: who should literature search, aims and purpose of literature searching, preparation, the search strategy, searching databases, supplementary searching, managing references and reporting the search process.ConclusionsEight key stages to the process of literature searching in systematic reviews were identified. These key stages are consistently reported in the nine guidance documents, suggesting consensus on the key stages of literature searching, and therefore the process of literature searching as a whole, in systematic reviews. Further research to determine the suitability of using the same process of literature searching for all types of systematic review is indicated.

How to write a Cochrane systematic review

[The Cochrane Collaboration and systematic literature reviews about the efficiency of a treatment]

How to Write a Systematic Review of the Literature

Systematic reviews of the literature: an introduction to current methods

How to Write a Systematic Review

How to carry out a literature search for a systematic review: a practical guide

An Overview of How to Search and Write a Medical Literature Review

How to Conduct and Publish Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses in Dentistry

Step by step guide to do a systematic review and meta-analysis for medical professionals

Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions

Search strategy formulation for systematic reviews: Issues, challenges and opportunities

How-To Create an Orthopaedic Systematic Review: A Step-by-Step Guide Part I: Study Design

Systematic reviews of clinical practice guidelines: a methodological guide

Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis

Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies

Conducting Systematic Reviews of Intervention Questions I: Writing the Review Protocol, Formulating the Question and Searching the Literature

Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews

The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners

A guide to interpreting systematic reviews and meta-analyses in neurosurgery and surgery

How to write a review article?

"How-to": scoping review?