How-To Create an Orthopaedic Systematic Review: A Step-by-Step Guide Part I: Study Design

Mitchell K. Ng,Matthew Magruder,Nathanael Heckmann,Ronald E. Delanois,Nicolas S. Piuzzi,Viktor E. Krebs,Michael A. Mont
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.059
IF: 4.435
2024-03-30
The Journal of Arthroplasty
Abstract:Systematic reviews are conducted through a consistent and reproducible method to search, appraise, and summarize information. Within the evidence-based pyramid, systematic reviews can be at the apex when incorporating high-quality studies, presenting the strongest form of evidence given their synthesis of results from multiple primary studies to level IV evidence, depending on the studies they incorporate. When combined and supplemented with a meta-analysis using statistical methods to pool the results of three or more studies, systematic reviews are powerful tools to help answer research questions. The aim of this review is to serve as a guide on how to: 1) design; 2) execute; and 3) publish an orthopaedic arthroplasty systematic review and meta-analysis. In Part I, we discuss how to develop an appropriate research question as well as source and screen databases. To date, commonly used databases to source studies include PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science. Although not all-encompassing, this paper serves as a starting point for those interested in performing and/or critically reviewing lower extremity arthroplasty systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?