Abstract:‘Looking fair’ is the desired goal of individuals and organizations. Fairness perceptions of organizational actions, by employees, translate into various favourable work outcomes. For instance, perceptions of fairness, defined as organizational justice, significantly influences attitudinal variables as job satisfaction and organizational commitment. However, the existing literature does not offer complete picture of this influence. In other words, the ‘underlying mechanism’ governing the influence of organizational justice on job satisfaction and organizational commitment is not fully understood. On the basis of extant literature review and arguments grounded in the social exchange theory, and ‘broaden and build’ theory of positive emotions, this study identifies psychological capital (PsyCap) as an explanatory mechanism for the influence of organizational justice on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. The primary objective of this study was to test a theoretical and structural model that hypothesized mediation of PsyCap in the influence of organizational justice on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. A survey-based methodology, with standardized scales was used. A pilot study was conducted to test the scale properties. A sample of 440 employees from the Indian service sector industry was drawn. A two-step process of analysis, with AMOS 16, was employed to test the structural model. The scales were assessed and found fit for reliability and validity criteria. Besides examining the significance of indirect effects using the bias-corrected confidence intervals with two-thousand bootstrap samples, the study also applied alternative⁄nested structural equation models to test the mediation hypotheses. Results are found to be consistent with the stated hypotheses thus confirming the mediation of PsyCap in the influence of organizational justice on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. The findings of this study advance available knowledge on job satisfaction and organizational commitment; and provide impetus to research in this domain by identifying PsyCap as an intervening variable. The study thus extends the application of PsyCap as an organizational variable capable of translating the effect of justice on satisfaction and commitment. It also supports and extends the view of previous researchers that PsyCap is a significant positive organizational behaviour (POB) variable, as it is capable of performance improvement and is open to development. From a managerial perspective, given the ‘open to control’ nature of PsyCap, it renders a significant tool in the hands of managers to control the satisfaction and commitment of their employees. Moreover, controlling PsyCap is much easier as compared to directly controlling justice perceptions.

Just Feelings? The Role of Affect in the Formation of Organizational Fairness Judgments

Impacts Of Social Comparison And Fairness Facet Preference On Justice Judgments

The Impact of Affect on Organizational Justice Perceptions: A Test of the Affect Infusion Model

Leadership Justice and Negative Organizational Behaviors: Mediated by Affective Commitment

Fairness at the collective level: A meta-analytic examination of the consequences and boundary conditions of organizational justice climate.

The Influence of Emotion on Fairness-Related Decision Making: A Critical Review of Theories and Evidence

Law and Emotion: How Empathy Forms the Judges' Sense of Justice

A Novel Approach to Fairness in Automated Decision-Making using Affective Normalization

Fairness at the Organizational Level: Examining the Effect of Organizational Justice Climate on Collective Turnover Rates and Organizational Performance

The fairness of human resource management practices: an assessment by the justice sensitive

Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions.

The Role of Emotion and Motivation in Jury Decision-Making

It's not only what you do, but why you do it: How managerial motives influence employees' fairness judgments

Fairness Heuristics and Substitutability Effects: Inferring the Fairness of Outcomes, Procedures, and Interpersonal Treatment when Employees Lack Clear Information.

How do people judge fairness in supervisor and peer relationships? Another assessment of the dimensions of justice

Emotions and Ethical Decision Making at Work: Organizational Norms, Emotional Dogs, and the Rational Tales They Tell Themselves and Others

How does Organizational Justice influence Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment? Explaining with Psychological Capital

Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow

Integrating Psychometrics and Computing Perspectives on Bias and Fairness in Affective Computing: A Case Study of Automated Video Interviews

The Effect of Non-Contingent Success on People's Desire for High Process Fairness