The "Double-Edged Sword" Effects of LMX Ambivalence———An Integrated Model of Two Approaches Based on Cognitive Flexibility and Job Anxiety
Dujuan Huang,Tongqing Zhu,Xue Ding,Xiaoliang Bi,Tao Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s381954
IF: 3.974
2022-11-03
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Dujuan Huang, 1 Tongqing Zhu, 1 Xue Ding, 2 Xiaoliang Bi, 3 Tao Sun 1 1 College of Business Administration, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, Anhui, People's Republic of China; 2 School of Financial Technology, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; 3 School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Xiaoliang Bi, School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200092, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 19512345360, Email Purpose: Bootleg Innovation helps enterprises create unconventional innovation achievements, and has gradually become an important approach for radical innovation under the background of open innovation. Through the integration of the cognitive-affective processing system and conservation of resources (COR) theory, the present study takes integrative complexity as a moderator, and explores the mechanism of LMX ambivalence on employees' bootleg innovation. Participants and Methods: A total of 387 employees and 110 supervising managers participated in the two-wave dyadic survey. To test our hypotheses, we performed the hierarchical regression and conducted bootstrapping analyses to test our hypotheses. Results: Findings indicated that LMX ambivalence not only improves employees' cognitive flexibility and promotes bootleg innovation, but also aggravates employees' job anxiety and hinders bootleg innovation. In addition, integrative complexity significantly moderates the above two mediating paths. Specifically, when integrative complexity was higher, the negative mediating effect of job anxiety was attenuated, and the positive mediating effect of cognitive flexibility was enhanced. Conclusion: Contrasting with previous research, this research analyzed the triggering mechanism of bootleg innovation combined with the dynamic interaction of environmental stimulus, emotion and cognition. The findings provide novel insight into how to achieve bootleg innovation. Keywords: LMX ambivalence, bootleg innovation, cognitive flexibility, job anxiety, integrative complexity Employees often encounter the tension that they are expected to be innovative while there are a set of rules to hinder their innovative behaviors in the organization. Constrained by institutional deficiency, rigid hierarchy structure, and limited organizational resources, 1 most of employees' innovative ideas are ignored by the organization. Some employees, however, continue to carry out their innovative ideas secretly even though rejected by the organization because they solidly believe those innovative ideas can be valuable. Those secret innovative behaviors, defined as bootleg innovation, are not uncommon in practice. If successful, it can bring radical innovation outcomes. Evidence has indicated that 10% of individuals have experienced bootleg innovation in R&D teams. 2 The emergence of Sogou browser, 3M packaging tape, and LED technology highlight the significance of bootleg innovation. With the diversity, boundaryless and openness of firm innovation, bootleg innovation will be an important innovative form for firms. Thus, it is of great significance to explore the antecedent of bootleg innovation, and further help firms break through the dilemma of innovation. Recently, a growing body of studies has examined the antecedents of bootleg innovation from the perspectives of proactive personality, 3 actual-wanted task identity, 4 risk propensity, 5 leaderships, 6 organizational support 7 and organizational climate. 8 However, these studies neglected employees' situation-awareness before actions and its resultant emotional state and mental activities. 9 Employee innovative behaviors are closely associated with emotions, and therefore we may gain more new insights by studying innovative behaviors from the emotional perspective. Previous research has suggested that LMX was shaped by a set of pleasant or disturbing events in the interactive process between leaders and their subordinates, and the quality of the LMX, to some extent, reflected the opportunities and supports employees acquired from their leaders. Thus, LMX can be considered as an important emotional event in the workforce, 10 and it can elicit emotional responses from subordinates, and thereafter influence their attitudes and behaviors. For example, high-quality LMX enables employees to feel being respected, promotes employee organizational identity, and thus bootleg innovation. Yet, the latest research indicate that relation can be -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary