Abstract:Background: Schools of public health (SPHs) are increasingly being recognised as important contributors of human, social and intellectual capital relevant to health policy and decision-making. Few studies within the implementation science literature have systematically examined knowledge exchange experiences within this specific organisational context. The purpose of this study was therefore to elicit whether documented facilitators and barriers to engaging with government decision-makers resonates within an academic SPH context. We sought to understand the variations in such experiences at four different levels of government decision-making. Furthermore, we sought to elicit intervention priorities as identified by faculty. Methods: Between May and December 2016, 211 (34%) of 627 eligible full-time faculty across one SPH in the United States of America participated in a survey on engagement with decision-makers at the city, state, federal and global government levels. Surveys were administered face-to-face or via Skype. Descriptive data as well as tests of association and logistic regression analyses were conducted using STATA. Results: Over three-quarters of respondents identified colleagues with ties to decision-makers, institutional affiliation and conducting policy-relevant research as the highest facilitators. Several identified time constraints, academic incentives and financial support as important contributors to engagement. Faculty characteristics, such as research areas of expertise, career track and faculty rank, were found to be statistically significantly associated with facilitators. The top three intervention priorities that emerged were (1) creating incentives for engagement, (2) providing funding for engagement and (3) inculcating an institutional culture around engagement. Conclusions: The data suggest that five principal categories of factors - individual characteristics, institutional environment, relational dynamics, research focus and funder policies - affect the willingness and ability of academic faculty to engage with government decision-makers. This study suggests that SPHs could enhance the relevance of their role in health policy decision-making by (1) periodically measuring engagement with decision-makers; (2) enhancing individual capacity in knowledge translation and communication, taking faculty characteristics into account; (3) institutionalising a culture that supports policies and practices for engagement in decision-making processes; and (4) creating a strategy to expand and nurture trusted, relevant networks and relationships with decision-makers.

University research centers as knowledge translation platforms: leveraging structure, support and resources to enhance multisectoral collaboration and advocacy

Capturing lessons learned from evidence-to-policy initiatives through structured reflection

Growing and fostering knowledge translation: Recommendations for health organisations from the SPHERE Envisionarium

Recognition of knowledge translation practice in Canadian health sciences tenure and promotion: A content analysis of institutional policy documents

How transdisciplinary research teams learn to do knowledge translation (KT), and how KT in turn impacts transdisciplinary research: a realist evaluation and longitudinal case study

Barriers and facilitators to knowledge translation activities within academic institutions in low- and middle-income countries

Increased use of knowledge translation strategies is associated with greater research impact on public health policy and practice: an analysis of trials of nutrition, physical activity, sexual health, tobacco, alcohol and substance use interventions

Implementation of a health policy advisory committee as a knowledge translation platform: the Nigeria experience

The effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies used in public health: a systematic review

Building a knowledge translation platform in Malawi to support evidence-informed health policy

Evidence map of knowledge translation strategies, outcomes, facilitators and barriers in African health systems

Academic Health Science Centres as Vehicles for Knowledge Mobilisation in Australia? A Qualitative Study

Impact of an organization-wide knowledge translation strategy to support evidence-informed public health decision making

Evidence-Based Health Communication in Practice: Driving Funding, Research, and Training Through the University of Texas at Austin Center for Health Communication

‘Doing’ or ‘using’ intersectionality? Opportunities and challenges in incorporating intersectionality into knowledge translation theory and practice

Graduate medical education and knowledge translation: role models, information pipelines, and practice change thresholds

Determinants of factors affecting readiness of academic institutions to conduct knowledge translation in low- and middle-income countries

A comprehensive monitoring and evaluation framework for evidence to policy networks

Review of published evidence on knowledge translation capacity, practice and support among researchers and research institutions in low- and middle-income countries

Factors affecting engagement between academic faculty and decision-makers: learnings and priorities for a school of public health

Evaluation of the “Foundations in Knowledge Translation” training initiative: preparing end users to practice KT