Abstract:Background: Effective communication is critical for safe, efficient clinical practice. Communication failures result in errors, misdiagnosis, inappropriate treatment and poor care. Communication errors also contribute to sentinel events and are an underlying factor in healthcare system complaints. Formal Clinical Communication (FCC) tools, such as ISBAR, improve patient outcomes. Governance of FCC is increasingly based around Electronic Medical Record (EMR), however much Informal clinical communication (ICC) occurs outside of the EMR. ICC involves disparate platforms including pagers, Short Message Service (SMS) texts, encrypted messaging apps, phones and local radio networks (eg Vocera). Documentation of ICC in the clinical record is low quality and not easily or routinely audited. ICC based on personal identities relies on accurate rosters, switchboard staff or secondary lists. Significant inefficiency and potential clinical risk can occur if the correct role to communicate with cannot be contacted quickly and easily. Local Problem: In 2019, Austin Health performed a clinical governance assessment of ICC processes against National Standards for FCC. Further investigation and process mapping of ICC occurred in 2020. This indicated a paucity of relevant policy and procedures to govern ICC practices, with highly variable and overly complex processes. Aims : 1. To document the technology used in informal communication between clinical and / or administrative staff. 2. To document the self-perceived impact on staff of current communications methods. 3. To document the self-perceived potential efficiency and safety impact of current communications methods. 4. To identify key factors for consideration in organisational informal communication improvement. Method: Multi-disciplinary on-line staff cross-sectional survey using Microsoft Forms. The survey sought to confirm the range of informal communication methods in use and identify respondents' perceptions of current multimodal communication technology issues and their inherent risks. Results: 115 self-selected clinical and administrative staff completed the survey. Multiple communication channels are used. Respondents noted high levels of frustration, delay, interruption and inefficiency. Desired communication improvements and use considerations were identified. Survey findings validated a prior clinical governance assessment of the existing ICC framework, and the need for technology reform. Conclusions: There are gaps in governance standards for ICC, both locally and at a broader level. Sequential additions to technology platforms have created a high-risk communications environment. Staff perceptions of inefficiency, delay, frustration and a high level of patient safety risk were consistent across professions. This work informed the subsequent development of an enterprise platform dedicated to informal clinical communication.

Academic Health Science Centres as Vehicles for Knowledge Mobilisation in Australia? A Qualitative Study

The international spread of Academic Health Science Centres: a scoping review and the case of policy transfer to England

Academic health science centre models across the developing countries and lessons for implementation in Indonesia: a scoping review

The impact of a regionally based translational cancer research collaborative in Australia using the FAIT methodology

Developing Outcomes Assessments For Collaborative, Cross-Institutional Benchmarking: Progress Of The Australian Medical Assessment Collaboration

The evaluation of health, disability and aged care-sector engagement with resources designed to support optimisation of the allied health assistant workforce: a qualitative study

Antimicrobial stewardship in Australia: the role of qualitative research in programme development

The Australian medical assessment collaboration: Developing the foundations for a national assessment of medical student learning outcomes

Evaluating allied health primary contact models of care: A mixed methods analysis of current practice

A thematic analysis of the role of the organisation in building allied health research capacity: a senior managers' perspective

Does an expanded allied health student training programme in regional New South Wales (Australia) result in a positive social return on investment? A protocol for a single-university education-based economic evaluation

Developing a knowledge translation program for health practitioners: Allied Health Translating Research into Practice

Impact of interprofessional student led health clinics for patients, students and educators: a scoping review

The health service perspective on determinants of success in allied health student research project collaborations: a qualitative study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

International clinical placements for Australian undergraduate nursing students: A systematic thematic synthesis of the literature

Quality management systems in Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services: a review of the literature

University staff perspectives on determinants of high-quality health professions student placements in regional, rural and remote Australia: protocol for a mixed-method study

Is it worth engaging in multi-stakeholder health services research collaborations? Reflections on key benefits, challenges and enabling mechanisms

Innovative Model for Promoting Interprofessional Dialogue and Action Across Healthcare Stakeholders: The ASAHP Collaborative Stakeholder Engagement Model

Leaders' perspectives on learning health systems: a qualitative study

Technology Based Challenges of Informal Clinical Communication in an Australian tertiary referral hospital : A mixed methods assessment of The Need for Change.