Abstract:Accurate assessment of animal emotion (affect) is an important goal in animal welfare science, and in areas such as neuroscience and psychopharmacology. Direct measures of conscious emotion are not available, so assessment of animal affect has relied on measures of the behavioural and physiological components of affective states. These are important indicators but have some limitations (e.g. measuring emotional arousal rather than valence (positivity vs negativity)). Human psychology research suggests that changes in cognitive function (information processing) can also be reliable indicators of emotional state (especially valence). For example, people in negative states attend to threats, retrieve negative memories, and make negative judgements about ambiguous stimuli more than happier people. Here we review a new research area investigating the possibility that such affect-induced ‘cognitive biases’ also occur in animals. We focus on a novel ‘judgement bias’ paradigm in which animals are trained that one cue predicts a positive event and another cue predicts a less positive/negative event, and are then presented with ambiguous (intermediate) cues. The hypothesis is that animals in a negative affective state will be more likely to respond to (‘judge’) these ambiguous cues as if they predict the negative event (a ‘pessimistic’ response), than animals in a more positive state. Recent studies of rats, dogs, rhesus monkeys, starlings and humans provide face-value support for this hypothesis. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the affect manipulation treatments used in these studies, and the possibility that treatment-induced changes in feeding motivation, general activity and learning are responsible for the effects observed, and we consider whether the type of bias observed and the precise design of the judgement bias task can provide information about different types of affective state. Judgement biases may result from the influence of affect on decision-making processes including attention to and perception of the ambiguous cue, evaluation of the value and probability (expected utility) of the outcomes of different responses, and action selection. Affect might also modulate general tendencies of loss, risk and ambiguity aversion, hence biasing decisions. We discuss these possibilities in relation to theory and findings from neurobiological and psychological studies of decision-making, in order to better understand the potential mechanisms underlying judgement biases. We conclude with some specific recommendations for study design and interpretation, and suggestions for future research in this area.

Administration of serotonin inhibitor p-Chlorophenylalanine induces pessimistic-like judgement bias in sheep

The influence of pharmacologically-induced affective states on attention bias in sheep

Attention Bias Test Measures Negative But Not Positive Affect in Sheep: A Replication Study

Effects of cognitive judgement bias and acute antidepressant treatment on sensitivity to feedback and cognitive flexibility in the rat version of the probabilistic reversal-learning test

Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms

Judgement bias of group housed gestating sows predicted by behavioral traits, but not physical measures of welfare

Stress produces negative judgement bias in cuttlefish

A translational rodent assay of affective biases in depression and antidepressant therapy

Selective Effects of 5-HT2C Receptor Modulation on Performance of a Novel Valence-Probe Visual Discrimination Task and Probabilistic Reversal Learning in Mice.

Mood induction alters attention toward negative-positive stimulus pairs in sheep

Brain serotonin transporter is associated with cognitive-affective biases in healthy individuals

Serotonin Modulates Sensitivity to Reward and Negative Feedback in a Probabilistic Reversal Learning Task in Rats

Serotonin depletion impairs both Pavlovian and instrumental reversal learning in healthy humans

Cognitive Bias under Adverse and Rewarding Conditions: A Systematic Review of Rodent Studies

Effect of pre-session discrimination training on performance in a judgement bias test in dogs

An attention bias test to assess anxiety states in laying hens

SERT and uncertainty: serotonin transporter expression influences information processing biases for ambiguous aversive cues in mice

Poor Decision Making and Sociability Impairment Following Central Serotonin Reduction in Inducible TPH2-Knockdown Rats

Serotonergic Modulation of Cognition; an Acute Challenge

A repeated measures cognitive affective bias test in rats: comparison with forced swim test