Abstract:Background: Animal models are critical tools in the study of psychiatric disorders; however, none of the current models fully reflect human stress-related disorders, even though most of the knowledge about the mechanisms of depression comes from animal studies. Animal studies are useful in pharmacological research, whereby we can obtain results that translate into patient treatment by controlling environmental factors, especially in behavioural research. The authors systematically reviewed this issue since medical databases provide access to many primary studies. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted based on 25 primary studies. The studies were identified in databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (December 2022) according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria established at the beginning of the research and published in the form of a protocol, following the PRISMA and Cochrane Collaboration methodology for secondary studies and CAMARADES (CAMARADES Berlin, QUEST-BIH Charité) for secondary studies on animals. Forest plot analyses were performed (data presented as Mean Difference, Random Model, Inverse Variance), Risk of Bias assessment (Systematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) evaluation), quality assessment of included studies (Animal research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE)), and a range of data from source publications were compiled in tabular form. The study analysed the popularity of both animal depression models (ADM) and rat strains used in pharmacological research to test the efficacy of antidepressant drugs based on the immobility time (IT) factor (Forced Swimming Test). The study examined selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, namely fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, citalopram, and escitalopram. Additionally, the study addressed issues concerning the "data availability statement" because precise IT data analysis was impossible in the case of 212 papers. Results: Our data confirm that the Chronic Unpredictable Mild Stress (CUMS) model is the most popular and versatile model used in preclinical depression research, while the two most popular rat strains were Wistar and Sprague-Dawley. The quality of included papers based on the ARRIVE assessment showed a ratio value equal to 0.63, meaning that studies were of intermediate overall quality. The Risk of Bias assessment based on the SYRCLE tool revealed a high risk related to the blinding and the random outcome assessment. In the meta-analysis, the results indicate that all analysed drugs demonstrated efficacy in reducing IT, and the most analysed drug was fluoxetine (confirmed based on 17 studies (19 models)). The analysis of the efficacy of ADMs showed that the most effective models were CUMS, Flinders Sensitive Line (genetic model), Social Isolation, Restraint Stress, and Low-dose Lipopolysaccharide (pharmacological model). Only 2.35% (5 out of 212) of corresponding authors responded to our data request. Conclusions: The study highlights the dominance of the CUMS model and the Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rat strains in preclinical depression research, affirming the efficacy of SSRIs, particularly fluoxetine, in reducing IT. The findings underscore the need for better data availability and methodological improvements despite intermediate overall study quality and notable bias risks. Enhanced transparency and rigorous assessment standards are essential for advancing the reliability of animal models in depression research.

A translational rodent assay of affective biases in depression and antidepressant therapy

Effects of cognitive judgement bias and acute antidepressant treatment on sensitivity to feedback and cognitive flexibility in the rat version of the probabilistic reversal-learning test

A repeated measures cognitive affective bias test in rats: comparison with forced swim test

Application of Cognitive Bias Testing in Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Mini-Review Based on Animal Studies

Evaluation of a novel translational task for assessing emotional biases in different species

Cognitive Bias under Adverse and Rewarding Conditions: A Systematic Review of Rodent Studies

Rodent tests of depression and anxiety: Construct validity and translational relevance

Rapid-acting antidepressant drugs modulate affective bias in rats

Corticolimbic Transcriptome Changes are State-Dependent and Region-Specific in a Rodent Model of Depression and of Antidepressant Reversal

Disrupted basolateral amygdala circuits supports negative valence bias in depressive states

Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms

Depression Assessment in Clinical Trials and Pre-clinical Tests: A Critical Review

Using tests and models to assess antidepressant-like activity in rodents

Selective Effects of 5-HT2C Receptor Modulation on Performance of a Novel Valence-Probe Visual Discrimination Task and Probabilistic Reversal Learning in Mice.

Cognitive signatures of depressive and anhedonic symptoms, and affective states, using computational modeling and neurocognitive testing

Chronic ecologically relevant stress effects on reverse‐translated touchscreen assays of reward responsivity and attentional processes in male rats: Implications for depression

Serotonin Modulates Sensitivity to Reward and Negative Feedback in a Probabilistic Reversal Learning Task in Rats

Early changes in emotional processing as a marker of clinical response to SSRI treatment in depression

Rodent Models of Depression: Forced Swim and Tail Suspension Behavioral Despair Tests in Rats and Mice

The tail suspension test as a model for assessing antidepressant activity: Review of pharmacological and genetic studies in mice

Comparative Efficacy of Animal Depression Models and Antidepressant Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis