Abstract:The subjective measures used to study mood disorders in humans cannot be replicated in animals; however, the increasing application of objective neuropsychological methods provides opportunities to develop translational animal tasks. Here we describe a novel behavioral approach, which has enabled us to investigate similar affective biases in rodents. In our affective bias test (ABT), rats encounter two independent positive experiences--the association between food reward and specific digging substrate--during discrimination learning sessions. These are performed on separate days under either neutral conditions or during a pharmacological or affective state manipulation. Affective bias is then quantified using a preference test where both previously rewarded substrates are presented together and the rat's choices recorded. The absolute value of the experience is kept consistent and all other factors are counterbalanced so that any bias at recall can be attributed to treatment. Replicating previous findings from studies in healthy volunteers, we observe significant positive affective biases following acute treatment with typical (fluoxetine, citalopram, reboxetine, venlafaxine, clomipramine) and atypical antidepressants (agomelatine, mirtazapine), and significant negative affective biases following treatment with drugs associated with inducing negative affective states in humans (FG7142, rimonabant, 13-cis retinoic acid). We also observed that acute psychosocial stress and environmental enrichment induce significant negative and positive affective biases, respectively, and provide evidence that these affective biases involve memory consolidation. The positive and negative affective biases induced in our test also mirror the antidepressant and pro-depressant effects of these drugs in patients suggesting our test has both translational and predictive validity. Our results suggest that cognitive affective biases could contribute to drug- or stress-induced mood changes in people and support the hypothesis that a cognitive neuropsychological mechanism contributes to antidepressant drug efficacy.

Rodent tests of depression and anxiety: Construct validity and translational relevance

Animal tests for anxiety-like and depression-like behavior in rats

Rodent Models of Depression: Reexamining Validity Without Anthropomorphic Inference

A translational rodent assay of affective biases in depression and antidepressant therapy

Animal models of depression and anxiety: What do they tell us about human condition?

Structured evaluation of rodent behavioral tests used in drug discovery research

Rodent Models of Depression: Forced Swim and Tail Suspension Behavioral Despair Tests in Rats and Mice

Using tests and models to assess antidepressant-like activity in rodents

Stress-based animal models of depression: Do we actually know what we are doing?

The future of rodent models in depression research

Depression Assessment in Clinical Trials and Pre-clinical Tests: A Critical Review

Nature and nurture: Comparing mouse behavior in classic versus revised anxiety‐like and social behavioral assays in genetically or environmentally defined groups

Animal Models of Depression: What Can They Teach Us about the Human Disease?

Rodent models of post-traumatic stress disorder: behavioral assessment

Experimental animal models for the simulation of depression and anxiety

Understanding stress: Insights from rodent models

Systematic analysis of severity in a widely used cognitive depression model for mice

Low cognitive competence as a vulnerability factor for behavioral despair in rats

Mouse Models for Studying Depression-Like States and Antidepressant Drugs

Application of Cognitive Bias Testing in Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Mini-Review Based on Animal Studies