Comparison of sequencing-based methods to profile DNA methylation and identification of monoallelic epigenetic modifications

R Alan Harris,Ting Wang,Cristian Coarfa,Raman P Nagarajan,Chibo Hong,Sara L Downey,Brett E Johnson,Shaun D Fouse,Allen Delaney,Yongjun Zhao,Adam Olshen,Tracy Ballinger,Xin Zhou,Kevin J Forsberg,Junchen Gu,Lorigail Echipare,Henriette O'Geen,Ryan Lister,Mattia Pelizzola,Yuanxin Xi,Charles B Epstein,Bradley E Bernstein,R David Hawkins,Bing Ren,Wen-Yu Chung,Hongcang Gu,Christoph Bock,Andreas Gnirke,Michael Q Zhang,David Haussler,Joseph R Ecker,Wei Li,Peggy J Farnham,Robert A Waterland,Alexander Meissner,Marco A Marra,Martin Hirst,Aleksandar Milosavljevic,Joseph F Costello
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1682
IF: 46.9
2010-09-19
Nature Biotechnology
Abstract:Methods for profiling DNA methylation differ in the physical principles used to detect modified cytosines. Harris et al. compare the performances of four sequencing-based technologies for genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation and combine two methods to enable detection of allelic differences in epigenetic marks.
biotechnology & applied microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?