Abstract:Aid organizations, activists, and the media often use graphic depictions of human suffering to elicit sympathy and aid. While effective, critics have condemned these practices as exploitative, objectifying, and deceptive, ultimately labeling them 'poverty porn.' This paper examines people's ethical judgments of portrayals of poverty and the criticisms surrounding them, focusing on the context of charity advertising. In Studies 1 and 2, we find that tactics that have been decried as deceptive (i.e., using an actor or staging a photograph) are judged to be less acceptable than those that have been decried as exploitative and objectifying (i.e., depicting an aid recipient's worst moments). This pattern occurs both when evaluating the tactics themselves (Studies 1a-1c) and when directly evaluating critics' arguments about them (Study 2). Studies 3 and 4 unpack the objection to deceptive tactics and find that participants' chief concern is not about manipulating the audience's responses or about distorting perceptions of reality. Participants report less concern about non-deceptive manipulation (using emotion to compel donations) and 'cherry-picked' portrayals of poverty (an ad showing an extreme, but real image) so long as there is some truth to the portrayal. Yet they are more sensitive to artificial images (e.g., an actor posing as poor), even when the image resembles reality. Thus, ethical judgments hinge more on whether poverty portrayals are genuine than whether they are representative. This work represents the first empirical investigation into ethical judgments of poverty portrayals. In doing so, this work sheds light on how people make sense of morally questionable tactics that are used to promote social welfare and deepens our understanding of reactions to deception.

An Attributional Analysis of Reactions to Poverty: The Political Ideology of the Giver and the Perceived Morality of the Receiver

Who Deserves Help? Evolutionary Psychology, Social Emotions, and Public Opinion about Welfare.

Consumption Poverty Alleviation: The Role of Poverty Attribution and Attitude in Poverty Alleviation Product Purchase

A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving.

Causal Attribution for Poverty in Young People: Sociodemographic Characteristics, Religious and Political Beliefs

Beliefs That White People Are Poor, Above and Beyond Beliefs That Black People Are Poor, Predict White (But Not Black) Americans' Attitudes Toward Welfare Recipients and Policy

The mediating role of attributions of poverty and wealth in the relationship between perceptions of economic inequality and redistribution preferences

Rationalizing Poverty in New York: Tales from the Middle Class

The (income-adjusted) price of good behavior: Documenting the counter-intuitive, wealth-based moral judgment gap.

Why Are Higher-Class Individuals Less Supportive of Redistribution? the Mediating Role of Attributions for Rich-Poor Gap

Ethical judgments of poverty depictions in the context of charity advertising

An Attributional Analysis of Moral Emotions: Naïve Scientists and Everyday Judges

The Psychology of Poverty Alleviation

Attributional ambiguity reduces charitable giving by relaxing social norms

Suspicious minds and views of fairness

Accepting Inequality Deters Responsibility: How Power Distance Decreases Charitable Behavior

On the psychology of poverty

Political Ideology and Moral Dilemma Judgments: An Analysis Using the CNI Model

Highlighting Opportunities (Versus Outcomes) Increases Support for Economic Redistribution

Poverty and economic decision making: a review of scarcity theory