Abstract:Poverty has been among the international academic hotspots and research on this issue may be summed up as six perspectives,including the income approach,the equality approach,the capability approach,the basic need approach,the approach based on human right,and the responsibility approach.These points of view,all being right-based approaches,are no more than the modern versions of classical theories of human rights which have inevitable defects both from the aspects of legal ontology and the actual effects of legal norms.They should be replaced by the approach of right to be free from poverty.The right to be free from poverty,from the perspectives of social solidarity and global justice,can be defined as a right of people,as individuals and groups,to obtain necessary physical and spiritual materials for a decent life,which is realized by the positive act of them to participate in,contribute to and share the achievement of the process of poverty reduction. It is not only necessary but also rational to construct this new concept of the right to be free from poverty reasonably.The right to be free from poverty is closely bonded to human dignity and has all the acknowledged elements of a right.Also,it is a right different and independent from the existing forms of human rights enumerated in the Covenants on Human Rights(1966) including the right to live,the right to health,the right to food,the right to housing and the right to work,therefore can not be replaced or covered by them,which has been proved by empirical studies from legal sociology. The stereotype of treating the reduction of poverty as a pure moral obligation should be broken,and a new pedigree of obligations to serve the implementation of the right to be free from poverty should be established.The foundation of the reduction of poverty will be established only when the transformation within this pedigree,that is,from moral obligations and the obligations with good faith to the institutional obligations,contractual obligations and interventional obligations,is finished.The path we have to take to achieve the reduction of poverty is to design a forcible legal mechanism which consists of five parts of empowerment,regulation,monitoring,cooperation and remedy.

Philosophical Misframings of Poverty

Poverty and economic decision making: a review of scarcity theory

Questioning Poverty, Questions for Poverty Analysis

Who counts in poverty research?

Amartya Kumar Sen’s ethical interpretation of poverty

Poverty as lack of capabilities: an analysis of the definition of poverty of Amartya Sen

A relational approach to durable poverty, inequality and power

On the psychology of poverty

An Attributional Analysis of Reactions to Poverty: The Political Ideology of the Giver and the Perceived Morality of the Receiver

What is missing from how we measure and understand the experience of poverty and deprivation in population health analyses?

[Intervention and representation of poverty]

Do mindsets shape intentions to help those in need? Unravelling the paradoxical effects of mindsets of poverty on helping intentions

On the Right to be Free from Poverty and It's Legal Mechanism

Do families in poverty need child and family social work?

The context of low socioeconomic status can undermine people's motivation for financial success

Tocqueville and Kuyper on the Problem of Poverty in Modern Society

Social work, poverty, and child welfare interventions

From Poverty to Disaster and Back: a Review of the Literature

The Psychology of Poverty Alleviation

The Crisis of Economics of Philanthropy and the Transformation of Its Paradigm

Beliefs That White People Are Poor, Above and Beyond Beliefs That Black People Are Poor, Predict White (But Not Black) Americans' Attitudes Toward Welfare Recipients and Policy