Proppant Transport Coupled with Propagation of Three-Dimensional Hydraulic-Natural Fractures
Yunpeng Wang,Ming Chen,Tiankui Guo,Zhanqing Qu,Bo Zhang,Mingkun Lv,Wenyu Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-024-04264-z
IF: 6.518
2024-12-06
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Abstract:This manuscript introduces a coupled model that simulates the propagation of three-dimensional (3D) complex fractures and the proppant transport. The model takes into account the interactions between hydraulic fractures (HFs) and natural fractures (NFs), the effects of stress interference, the distribution of fluid between multiple clusters, and fluid leak-off. Rock deformation is addressed utilizing the Displacement Discontinuity Method (DDM), while the flow of fluids within fractures is addressed with the Finite Difference Method (FDM). The proppant transport is modeled within the Eulerian–Eulerian framework, and its behavior is resolved using the first-order upwind scheme in conjunction with the FDM. The model's accuracy in predicting both fracture propagation and proppant transport is confirmed through validation against reference data. Utilizing this simulator, we investigate the transport of proppant during the propagation of 3D complex fractures. The findings reveal the following insights: (1) the narrow width and slow flow velocities at the intersection points of complex fractures predispose large-sized proppant to bridge and plug. (2) In scenarios with low horizontal stress difference, smaller proppant particles effortlessly enter NFs, whereas larger particles face significant entry challenges. The propped area of NFs is markedly reduced by 85% when using larger proppant sizes compared to smaller ones. The pumping schedule exerts minimal influence on the propped fracture area but significantly impacts the distribution of proppant concentration within the fractures. From the wellbore to the fracture front, a ramp-up concentration schedule shows a pattern of high concentration near the wellbore and diminishing concentration towards the fracture front. In contrast, a constant concentration schedule results in a more uniform proppant distribution, whereas a pulse schedule leads to discontinuous proppant placement. (3) Even when the final fracture shows planar characteristics, it is essential to integrate a 3D complex fracture model into fracturing simulators to account for the bypassing behavior within the fracture network. (4) In the Appendix, a comparative analysis of the computational efficiency of several commonly utilized algorithms is also presented. This research offers practical guidance for field applications and serves as a reference for fracturing simulation practitioners in selecting the most suitable algorithms.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,engineering, geological