Abstract:We find that pesticide exposure and risk differ between honeybees and other managed and wild bees during apple pollination. Furthermore, pesticide exposure is a landscape‐scale phenomenon and therefore measures to reduce exposure must consider the surroundings beyond focal farms. Limiting orchard sprays, while reducing on‐farm exposures, will not protect far‐foraging bees from off‐farm exposures such as thiamethoxam, which we hypothesize is coming from nearby seed‐treated corn fields planted during apple bloom. Most pesticide research has focussed on risk to managed honeybees, but other managed and wild bees are also exposed to pesticides. Critically, we know little about the magnitude and sources of risk to honeybees compared with other bees during crop pollination. To compare pesticide exposure and risk across wild and managed bees, we sampled the main bee groups present during bloom in 20 apple orchards, including managed honeybees (Apis mellifera), managed bumblebee workers (Bombus impatiens), wild mining bees (Andrena spp. and Andrena [Melandrena] spp.), bumblebee foundress queens (Bombus impatiens) and eastern carpenter bees (Xylocopa virginica). We screened all bees for 92 pesticides and computed a Risk Quotient using available toxicity data (honeybee LD50s), adjusting for differences in toxicity known to scale with body mass. To gain insight into exposure origin, we compared residues in bees to those in focal orchard apple and dandelion flowers. Nearly all bee samples contained pesticides (95%), with the average contamination level ranging from 7.1 ± 2.8 parts per billion (ppb) in B. impatiens workers to 388.4 ± 146.2 ppb in Andrena. Exposure profiles were similar for all bees except A. mellifera, whose unique exposure profile included high levels of the neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam. All bee groups except wild B. impatiens queens had at least one sample exceeding a US Environmental Protection Agency or European Food Safety Authority exposure level of concern. Apis mellifera experienced significantly greater risk than other bee groups, with 63% and 81% of samples exceeding an acute or chronic exposure level of concern, respectively. Risk to honeybees was driven primarily by high thiamethoxam levels not found in focal orchard flowers and likely originating outside the orchard. Synthesis and applications: We find that pesticide exposure and risk differ between honeybees and other managed and wild bees during apple pollination. Furthermore, pesticide exposure is a landscape‐scale phenomenon and therefore measures to reduce exposure must consider the surroundings beyond focal farms. Limiting orchard sprays, while reducing on‐farm exposures, will not protect far‐foraging bees from off‐farm exposures such as thiamethoxam, which we hypothesize is coming from nearby seed‐treated corn fields planted during apple bloom.

Dominance of honey bees is negatively associated with wild bee diversity in commercial apple orchards regardless of management practices

Floral Resource Competition Between Honey Bees and Wild Bees: Is There Clear Evidence and Can We Guide Management and Conservation?

Global taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity of bees in apple orchards

Neglecting non-bee pollinators may lead to substantial underestimation of competition risk among pollinators

Honey bees (Apis mellifera) modify plant-pollinator network structure, but do not alter wild species' interactions

Inferring long-term and short-term determinants of genetic diversity in honey bees: Beekeeping impact and conservation strategies

Wildflower plantings and honeybee competition impact nutritional quality of wild bee diets

Estimating genus-specific effects of non-native honey bees and urbanization on wild bee communities: A case study in Maryland, United States

Functional trait mismatch between native and introduced bee pollinators servicing a global fruit crop

Impacts of beekeeping on wild bee diversity and pollination networks in the Aegean Archipelago

Pesticide risk during commercial apple pollination is greater for honeybees than other managed and wild bees

Diverse landscapes have a higher abundance and species richness of spring wild bees by providing complementary floral resources over bees’ foraging periods

Increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: Implications for bee health and competition

Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification

Pollination by wild bees yields larger strawberries than pollination by honey bees

[Effects of landscape complexity and local management on bee pollinator diversity in apple orchards in Changping District, Beijing, China]

The worldwide importance of honey bees as pollinators in natural habitats

Red mason bees cannot compete with honey bees for floral resources in a cage experiment

Diversified Farming in a Monoculture Landscape: Effects on Honey Bee Health and Wild Bee Communities

Wild Bee Conservation in Viticulture: Effects of Semi‐Natural Habitats, Organic Management, and Fungicide Reduction

Response of wild bee diversity, abundance, and functional traits to vineyard inter‐row management intensity and landscape diversity across Europe