Abstract:Objectives: In the 1990s, research was conducted at General Motors R&D Center on seat safety in rear impacts. It led to the development of high retention seats and an active head restraint to improve occupant safety. This article provides an overview of the design principles found from that research and focuses on seat characteristics that lower whiplash risks. Methods: Sled and quasistatic seat testing showed how occupants interact with the seat in rear impacts and what seat characteristics improve occupant retention, energy management, and support of the head-neck, lowering injury risks. Neck displacements, moments, and forces were used to assess whiplash and more severe injury risks. A QST test was developed to quasi-statically push a dummy rearward into the seat to determine seat stiffness (k), frame strength (j), and peak bending moment (M(Hpt)). These parameters were related to neck displacements associated with whiplash. Sled tests were run with in-position and out-of-position male and female Hybrid III dummies to assess performance. A high retention seat and active head restraint were developed and put into production in 1997. Results: High retention seats have 2.3 times greater moment, develop 2.2 times greater load, but have the same stiffness as earlier yielding seats. Seat stiffness was found to be a principle characteristic related to neck displacements associated with whiplash. The combination of a stronger frame, yielding seatback, and high-forward head restraint in the high retention seat provides early head support and low neck displacements in rear impacts. Larger reductions in neck displacement were obtained by adding an active head restraint that moves the head restraint forward and upward by occupant penetration into the seatback. This substantially reduces head contact time, neck displacements, and loads. Conclusions: Whiplash risks are related to seat stiffness, the position of the head restraint, and frame strength. Low seat stiffness allows the occupant to move into the seatback without high loads on the torso until the head-neck is supported by the head restraint. A strong seat frame reduces early seatback rotation that increases the gap to the head restraint and drops it in relation to the occupant's head. A high and forward head restraint provides support of the head and neck. Large forces can be applied to the occupant once the head, neck, and torso are supported by the seat and head restraint without adverse loading of the spine. The addition of an active head restraint closes the gap behind the head before significant load develops on the neck. The movement provides a more upward trajectory of the head restraint. Low-speed rear crashes are not just a matter of whiplash; older occupants, some with cervical stenosis, are at risk for paralyzing spinal cord injury.

Car seat design to improve rear-impact protection

A Vehicle Seat Design Concept for Reducing Whiplash Injury Risk in Low-Speed Rear Impact

Concept design of an active headrest for neck injury mitigation of rear impact

Seat design principles to reduce neck injuries in rear impacts

Combined with finite element analysis of car seat safety performance improvement

An Energy-Absorbing Sliding Seat for Reducing Neck Injury Risks in Rear Impact--analysis for Prototype Built.

Research on Structural Design of Active Headrest in Rear End Collision

The influence of seatback characteristics on cervical injury risk in severe rear impacts

Investigation of occupant kinematics and injury risk in a reclined and rearward-facing seat under various frontal crash velocities

Investigation of Risk Factors Affecting Injuries in Reclining Seat under Frontal Impact

The Effect of Changing the Angle of the Passenger Car Seat Backrest on the Head Trajectories of the 50th Percentile Male Dummy

Simulation Study of Effect of Seat Design Parameters on Occupant Neck Injury Potential in Low-Speed Rear Impact

Study on the influence of seating orientation during frontal impacts by child occupant human body model response analysis

Safety priorities for occupant protection in rear impacts

Effects of an integrated safety system for swivel seat arrangements in frontal crash

Analysis of Biomechanics of Motor Vehicle Collisions for Passenger Cars: Implications for Passenger Vehicle Safety and Future Car Design Innovations

Impact responses and injury analyses of a three-year-old occupant seating in forward and rearward facing CRSs using different computational models

An evaluation of front seat distance from rear facing child restraint systems in prevention of injury in frontal crash tests

Improving protection system for wheelchair-seated occupants in vehicle side impacts

Control Algorithm of Active Headrest in Rear End Collision

Pediatric occupant human body model kinematic and kinetic response variation to changes in seating posture in simulated frontal impacts – with and without automatic emergency braking