Identification of nitrogen sources and transformations within karst springs using isotope tracers of nitrogen

Andrea R. Albertin,James O. Sickman,Agnieszka Pinowska,R. Jan Stevenson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9592-0
IF: 4.812
2011-03-22
Biogeochemistry
Abstract:Isotope analyses of nitrate and algae were used to gain better understanding of sources of nitrate to Florida’s karst springs and processes affecting nitrate in the Floridan aquifer at multiple scales. In wet years, δ15N and δ18O of nitrate ranged from +3 to +9‰ in headwater springs in north Florida, indicating nitrification of soil ammonium as the dominant source. With below normal rainfall, the δ15N and δ18O of nitrate were higher in almost all springs (reaching +20.2 and +15.3‰, respectively) and were negatively correlated with dissolved oxygen. In springs with values of δ15N-NO3 and δ18O-NO3 greater than +10‰, nitrate concentrations declined 40–50% in dry years and variations in the δ15N and δ18O of nitrate were consistent with the effects of denitrification. Modeling of the aquifer as a closed system yielded in situ fractionation caused by denitrification of 9 and 18‰ for Δ18O and Δ15N, respectively. We observed no strong evidence for local sources of nitrate along spring runs; concentrations declined downstream (0.42–3.3 μmol-NO3 L−1 per km) and the isotopic dynamics of algae and nitrate indicated a closed system. Correlation between the δ15N composition of nitrate and algae was observed at regional and spring-run scales, but the relationship was complicated by varying isotopic fractionation factors associated with nitrate uptake (Δ ranged from 2 to 13‰). Our study demonstrates that nitrate inputs to Florida’s springs are derived predominantly from non-point sources and that denitrification is detectable in aquifer waters with relatively long residence time (i.e., matrix flow).
environmental sciences,geosciences, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?