Abstract:The purpose of this study was to examine the potential interdependent relationships between religiosity, conservatism, social value orientation and philanthropy. Participants included members of four religious institutions. A non-experimental survey design was used gather information. Subjects were given a hypothetical task related to social value orientation, two scales of measurement related to religiosity and philanthropy and asked to self-identifr their political orientation. Chi Square analysis identified a significant relationship between political orientation and social value orientation. A correlation was found between religiosity and philanthropy within the liberal sample, rather than in the suspected conservative sample. Additionally, a one-way analysis of variance revealed that there were no significant differences in attitudes towards philanthropy. Results provide support for models suggesting that religion promotes competing psychological stances: conservatism and a prosocial value orientation. The Pew Research Center (2012) recently reported that America's politics fall along partisan lines and are more polarized than at any other time in the previous 25 years. This sentiment is often alluded to in today's media, and the 2012 Presidential election evidenced this as well. Each candidate emphasized that the 2012 election was about the fundamentally different paths on which America could be lead. A primary way that the policies of conservatives and liberals differ is the degree to which they facilitate government intervention in socioeconomic matters. Generally, the conservative base supports policies that stress minimal intervention. What is striking about this is that a core component of the conservative base is largely religious. While religious institutions typically promote prosocial attitudes and action, such as helping the poor, conservative economics reduce the amount of spending on social welfare programs. It seems that in regard to helping those of a lower socioeconomic class, political conservatism violates one of the primary tenets of most churches, yet many religious individuals continue to identify with conservative ideology (Guth, Kellstedt, Smidt, & Green, 2006; Kelly & Morgan, 2008; Layman & Carmines, 1997). This apparent contradiction was addressed extensively in a study conducted by Malka, Soto, Cohen, & Miller (2011). Their research was based on the hypothesis that religion has competing psychological influences on social welfare attitudes, and findings suggested that religiosity was a predictor for both opposition and approval of social welfare programs. It was argued that there are two pathways by which an individual can be influenced: one stressing conservatism, the other stressing prosocial values. Although specific determinants leading an individual to either pathway were not identified, the conservative pathway can be understood by recognizing that many politically conservative messages are those that are supported by the church. For instance, stances on sexuality, abortion and traditional families are topics that are central to each institution's identity. In relation to these stances, opposition to social welfare was hypothesized to be connected to one's need to be consistent in his or her world views. Malka et al. (2011) state that when a religious individual's views are aligned with the conservative end of politics, he may, in turn, "drag" his view of social welfare toward the conservative side so that his

A Two-edged Sword: The Differential Effect of Religious Belief and Religious Social Context on Attitudes towards Democracy

Religious Commitment, Subjective Income, and Satisfaction Towards the Functioning of Democracy in Latin America. A Mediation Analysis Model Based on Latinobarómetro

When the chickens come home to roost: The long‐term impact of party positions on religious voting

Attitudes towards Religions: The Impact of Being Out of the Religious Group

The Effect of Education on Nationalism and Ethnic Exclusionism: An International Comparison

A study of religiosity and conservatismin relation to social value orientation and philanthropy

Religion, Culture, and Politics: Analyzing the Influence of Religious Beliefs on Sociopolitical Dynamics

The determinants of democracy: a sensitivity analysis

Radical Distrust: Are Economic Policy Attitudes Tempered by Social Trust?

Liberal-conservative asymmetries in anti-democratic tendencies are partly explained by psychological differences in a nationally representative U.S. sample

Survey mode and satisfaction with democracy

Religious Affiliation, Religious Attendance, and Participation in Social Change Organizations

Homogeneity as a Pre-Condition for Democracy: The Influence of Religious Fragmentation on the Effect of Electoral Reforms on Public Goods in China∗ (Incomplete)

Positive beliefs about cross-partisan empathy can strengthen Americans' support for democracy

How Does Democracy Influence Citizens' Perceptions Of Government Corruption? A Cross-National Study

Citizens’ inflated perceptions of the extent of democracy in different African countries: are individuals’ notions of the state an answer to the puzzle?

Do religious beliefs matter for economic values?

How Citizenship Norms and Digital Media Use Affect Political Participation: A Two-Wave Panel Analysis

‘You are not my type’: The role of identity in evaluating democracy & human rights promotion

Are there potential costs for humility in a pluralistic democracy?: A longitudinal investigation of immigrants in the New Zealand attitudes and values study

The Effect of White Social Prejudice on Support for American Democracy