Abstract:Statism and anarchism are a binary opposition that divides Marxists into two irreconcilable camps. This opposition was felt especially irresistible during the Iron Curtain. But already in the 1980s, both in Soviet philosophy and in European Marxism, the idea of dialogue and communication was actively gaining popularity, which called for compromise between opponents. And today, when the depoliticizing nature of late capitalism tendentiously smooth out “rough edges,” imposing radical centrism according to Anthony Gidden contradictions completely lose their fundamental importance. Within the framework of this hypothesis, the author constructs a theoretical dialogue between Italian post-Operatism (Antonio Negri, Paolo Virno, Franco Berardi, Maurizio Lazzarato, etc.) and domestic cultural philosophies (Vladimir Bibler, Vadim Mezhuyev, Nal Zlobin, Moses Kagan, Arnold Arnoldov, etc.), which are usually located at opposite poles of the political spectrum: postoperatives are known as anarchists, and cultural philosophers are more conservative and rather closer to the Social Democrats. Both schools, referring to Karl Marx’s early works, analyze a new reality where the role of the main producer is occupied by a cultural person (scientist/artist) or a postindustrial worker. Both schools experience a certain affect of disappointment in radical political changes, and therefore see the main way to improve society no longer in political struggle, but in culture and communication. But while Italian Marxists urge to seek horizontal solidarity in subcultures, cultural philosophers take a position of power, developing pedagogical programs to make from proletariat the so-called cognitariat. The post-operatives label the new society emerging with the term “Empire.” The author of the article draws parallels between the new Empire and the late USSR, in which cultural philosophers worked. The article compares critical and apologetic views on post- Fordist production, as well as examines two proposed Enlightenment projects. The article attempts to demonstrate the theoretical similarities of the two directions and lays a certain foundation for their convergence with the aim of creating a dialectical theory that would combine both elements of pedagogy and a program of horizontal solidarity.

A NOTE ON EPISTEMIC NAÏVETÉ IN MARX AND ENGELS

The Problem Is Inequality, Not Private Property and Markets

Working Out Marx: Marxism and the End of the Work Society

Marx and Weber and the logic of historical explanation: The rise of machine capitalism

Marx, exploitation, and socioeconomic justice: Analytical and strategic possibilities

Remarks on Marx and Changing the World

Capitalist Critique of Karl Marx on Surplus Value

Is "capitalism" a misnomer?: on Marx's "capitalism" and knight's "civilization"

Marxism Beyond the Economy and Exploitation Beyond the Wage

Marxism And Ecology: Marx'S Theory Of Labour Process Revisited

Beyond the Utopia. Two Viewpoints on Post-Industrial Labor

Which Capital, Which Marx? Basic Income between Mainstream Economics, Critical Theory, and the Logic of Capital

Ethics, Alienation, and Ontology: The impossible is the starting point of each possible

The Philosophical Method of Marx's Economic Assumptions as Exemplified in the Relationship between Two Definitions of "Socially Necessary Labor Time"

The Logic of Das Kapital and the Stance of Marxism

Is Marx's Theory of Alienated Labor in Paris Manuscript Circular Reasoning

In-itself for-itself: Towards second-generation neo-Marxist class theory

The Disenchantment of "Alienation" in Marx's Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 from the Perspective of Evolutionary Psychology

Community and Innovation: From Tönnies to Marx

On the Marxist View of Labor-Capital Relations: Modern Approach