Abstract:Objectives To compare the biomechanical performance of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA), the "upside-down" less invasive plating system (LISS), and proximal femoral locking plate (PFLP) in fixing different fracture models of subtrochanteric fractures. Methods Thirty composite femurs were divided into three equal groups (PFNA, PFLP, and reverse LISS). The implant-femur constructs were tested under axial compression load (0-1400 N) from models I to IV, which represented the Seinsheimer type I subtrochanteric fracture, type IIIa subtrochanteric fracture with the posteromedial fragment reduced; type IIIa subtrochanteric fracture with the posteromedial fragment lost; and type IV subtrochanteric fracture, respectively. Axial stiffness was analyzed for each group. Each group was then divided into two subgroups, one of which underwent torsional and axial compression failure testing, while the other subgroup underwent axial compression fatigue testing. The torsional stiffness, failure load, and cycles to failure were analyzed. Results PFNA had the highest axial stiffness (F = 761.265, p < 0.0001) and failure load (F = 48.801, p < 0.0001) in model IV. The axial stiffness and failure load of the PFLP were significantly higher than those of the LISS (p < 0.0001, p = 0.001). However, no significant difference in axial stiffness was found between models I to III (model I: F = 2.439, p = 0.106; model II: F = 2.745, p = 0.082; model III: F = 0.852, p = 0.438) or torsional stiffness in model IV (F = 1.784, p = 0.187). In fatigue testing, PFNA did not suffer from construct failure after 90,000 cycles of axial compression. PFLP and LISS were damaged within 14,000 cycles, although LISS withstood more cycles than PFLP (t = 3.328, p = 0.01). Conclusion The axial stiffness of the three implants was similar in models I to III. The biomechanical properties of PFNA were the best of the three implants in terms of axial stiffness, failure load, and fatigue testing cycles in model IV. The axial stiffness and failure load of the PFLP were better than those of the reverse LISS, but PFLP had fewer cycles in the fatigue tests than the reverse LISS.

The biomechanics of plate fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures near the tip of a total hip implant: cables, screws, or both?

The biomechanics of plate repair of periprosthetic femur fractures near the tip of a total hip implant: the effect of cable-screw position

Theoretical analysis of changes in femoral stresses after total hip arthroplasty]

Periprosthetic fracture fixation in Vancouver B1 femoral shaft fractures: A biomechanical study comparing two plate systems

Optimal plate fixation of distal femoral fractures in the presence of a well fixed cemented hip arthroplasty femoral stem

Impact of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation plating constructs on local stiffness, load transfer, and bone strains

Biomechanical testing of a computationally optimized far cortical locking plate versus traditional implants for distal femur fracture repair

Biomechanical superiority of locking plate designed with cluster of head screws compared to conventional buttress plate for fixation of posteromedial tibial plateau fractures: A computational assessment

Establishment Of A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model And Biomechanical Analysis Of Three Different Internal Fixation Methods For Humeral Greater Tuberosity Fracture

Screw and plate fixation for fractures of tibial shaft: three-dimensional finite element analysis

Experimental and probabilistic analysis of distal femoral periprosthetic fracture: a comparison of locking plate and intramedullary nail fixation. Part A: experimental investigation

A Locking Plate Designed With Cluster of Head Screws Would Be Biomechanically Superior Than Conventional Buttress Plate For The Fixation of Posteromedial Tibial Plateau Fractures: A Computational Assessment

Biomechanical analysis of internal fixation system stability for tibial plateau fractures

The impact of plate length, fibula integrity and plate placement on tibial shaft fixation stability: a finite element study

Biomechanical Study of Intramedullary Versus Extramedullary Implants for Four Types of Subtrochanteric Femoral Fracture

Dorsal Plating, Lateral Plating, and Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Extra-Articular Proximal Phalangeal Fractures: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Comparison

Comprehensive biomechanical analysis of three clinically used fixation constructs for posterior malleolar fractures using cadaveric and finite element analysis

Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation methods for fracture dislocation involving the proximal tibia

Computational analysis of the biomechanical stability of internal fixation of the lateral tibial plateau fracture: A mechanical stability study

Comparing the Biomechanical Stability of Cerclage Cable with Plate Insert Versus Locking Screw in Periprosthetic Humeral Fracture

Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary nail and plate osteosynthesis for extra-articular proximal tibial fractures with segmental bone defect