Abstract:Speculative execution attacks exploiting speculative execution to leak secrets have aroused significant concerns in both industry and academia. They mainly exploit covert or side channels over microarchitectural states left by mis-speculated and squashed instructions (i.e., transient instructions). Most such attacks target cache states. Existing cache-based defenses against speculative execution attacks fall into two categories, Invisible and Undo. Most Invisible defenses buffer execution metadata of speculative instructions and place them into the cache only if the speculatively executed instructions become determined. Motivated by the fact that mis-speculations are rare cases, Undo defenses allow speculative instructions to modify cache states. Upon a mis-speculation, they rollback cache states to the ones prior to the execution of transient instructions. However, Invisible defenses have been recently found insecure by the speculative interference attack. This calls for a deep security inspection of Undo defenses against speculative execution attacks. In this paper, we present unXpec as the first attack against Undo-based safe speculation. It exploits the secret-dependent timing channel exhibited through the rollback operations of Undo defenses. Specifically, the rollback process requires both invalidating cache lines brought into the cache by transient instructions and restoring evicted cache lines from the cache by transiently loaded data. This opens up a channel that encodes secret via the timing difference between when rollback involves much invalidation and restoration or not. We further leverage eviction sets to enforce more restoration operations. This yields a longer rollback time and thus a larger secret-dependent timing difference. We demonstrate the timing channel over the open-source CleanupSpec, a representative Undo solution. A single transient load can trigger a secret-dependent timing difference of 22 cycles (without eviction sets) of 32 cycles (with eviction sets), which is sufficiently exploitable for constructing a covert channel for speculative execution attacks. We run unXpec on the gem5 simulator with CleanupSpec enabled. The results show that unXpec can leak secrets at a high rate of 140 Kbps with an accuracy over 90%. Simply enforcing constant-time rollback to mitigate unXpec may induce an over 70% performance overhead.

SpecSafe: detecting cache side channels in a speculative world

Exploiting Security Dependence for Conditional Speculation Against Spectre Attacks

StatekeepSpec: Securing Speculative Execution Via Forbidding Change-Of-State.

Protecting Cache States Against Both Speculative Execution Attacks and Side-channel Attacks

unXpec: Breaking Undo-based Safe Speculation

SCAFinder: Formal Verification of Cache Fine-Grained Features for Side Channel Detection

SpecBox: A Label-Based Transparent Speculation Scheme Against Transient Execution Attacks

Identifying Cache-Based Side Channels through Secret-Augmented Abstract Interpretation

Prefender: A Prefetching Defender Against Cache Side Channel Attacks as a Pretender

Mitigating Speculation-based Attacks through Configurable Hardware/Software Co-design

SoK: Practical Foundations for Software Spectre Defenses

Detecting and Mitigating Cache Side Channel Threats on Intel SGX

CacheGuard: A Behavior Model Checker for Cache Timing Side-Channel Security: (invited Paper)

SMoTherSpectre: exploiting speculative execution through port contention

Uncovering and Exploiting AMD Speculative Memory Access Predictors for Fun and Profit

Reorder Buffer Contention: A Forward Speculative Interference Attack for Speculation Invariant Instructions

Lost and Found in Speculation: Hybrid Speculative Vulnerability Detection

Cats vs. Spectre: An Axiomatic Approach to Modeling Speculative Execution Attacks

Optimization and Amplification of Cache Side Channel Signals

A Formal Methodology for Verifying Side-Channel Vulnerabilities in Cache Architectures

Automatic and Incremental Repair for Speculative Information Leaks