Abstract:Speculative execution attacks exploiting speculative execution to leak secrets have aroused significant concerns in both industry and academia. They mainly exploit covert or side channels over microarchitectural states left by mis-speculated and squashed instructions (i.e., transient instructions). Most such attacks target cache states. Existing cache-based defenses against speculative execution attacks fall into two categories, Invisible and Undo. Most Invisible defenses buffer execution metadata of speculative instructions and place them into the cache only if the speculatively executed instructions become determined. Motivated by the fact that mis-speculations are rare cases, Undo defenses allow speculative instructions to modify cache states. Upon a mis-speculation, they rollback cache states to the ones prior to the execution of transient instructions. However, Invisible defenses have been recently found insecure by the speculative interference attack. This calls for a deep security inspection of Undo defenses against speculative execution attacks. In this paper, we present unXpec as the first attack against Undo-based safe speculation. It exploits the secret-dependent timing channel exhibited through the rollback operations of Undo defenses. Specifically, the rollback process requires both invalidating cache lines brought into the cache by transient instructions and restoring evicted cache lines from the cache by transiently loaded data. This opens up a channel that encodes secret via the timing difference between when rollback involves much invalidation and restoration or not. We further leverage eviction sets to enforce more restoration operations. This yields a longer rollback time and thus a larger secret-dependent timing difference. We demonstrate the timing channel over the open-source CleanupSpec, a representative Undo solution. A single transient load can trigger a secret-dependent timing difference of 22 cycles (without eviction sets) of 32 cycles (with eviction sets), which is sufficiently exploitable for constructing a covert channel for speculative execution attacks. We run unXpec on the gem5 simulator with CleanupSpec enabled. The results show that unXpec can leak secrets at a high rate of 140 Kbps with an accuracy over 90%. Simply enforcing constant-time rollback to mitigate unXpec may induce an over 70% performance overhead.

StatekeepSpec: Securing Speculative Execution Via Forbidding Change-Of-State.

Exploiting Security Dependence for Conditional Speculation Against Spectre Attacks

SpecSafe: detecting cache side channels in a speculative world

SpecBox: A Label-Based Transparent Speculation Scheme Against Transient Execution Attacks

unXpec: Breaking Undo-based Safe Speculation

SVP: Safe and Efficient Speculative Execution Mechanism Through Value Prediction.

Mitigating Speculation-based Attacks through Configurable Hardware/Software Co-design

Protecting Cache States Against Both Speculative Execution Attacks and Side-channel Attacks

Uncovering and Exploiting AMD Speculative Memory Access Predictors for Fun and Profit

Secure Speculation Via Speculative Secret Flow Tracking.

Lost and Found in Speculation: Hybrid Speculative Vulnerability Detection

Reorder Buffer Contention: A Forward Speculative Interference Attack for Speculation Invariant Instructions

Do You Even Lift? Strengthening Compiler Security Guarantees Against Spectre Attacks

Prefender: A Prefetching Defender Against Cache Side Channel Attacks as a Pretender

SpectreRewind: Leaking Secrets to Past Instructions

SoK: Practical Foundations for Software Spectre Defenses

Cancellable Memory Requests: A transparent, lightweight Spectre mitigation

SPECRUN: The Danger of Speculative Runahead Execution in Processors

SNIP: Speculative Execution and Non-Interference Preservation for Compiler Transformations

SPOILER: Speculative Load Hazards Boost Rowhammer and Cache Attacks

ProSpeCT: Provably Secure Speculation for the Constant-Time Policy (Extended version)