Effectiveness of ex ante honesty oaths in reducing dishonesty depends on content
Janis H. Zickfeld,Karolina A. Ścigała,Christian T. Elbæk,John Michael,Mathilde H. Tønnesen,Gabriel Levy,Shahar Ayal,Isabel Thielmann,Laila Nockur,Eyal Peer,Valerio Capraro,Rachel Barkan,Simen Bø,Štěpán Bahník,Daniele Nosenzo,Ralph Hertwig,Nina Mazar,Alexa Weiss,Ann-Kathrin Koessler,Ronit Montal-Rosenberg,Sebastian Hafenbrädl,Yngwie Asbjørn Nielsen,Patricia Kanngiesser,Simon Schindler,Philipp Gerlach,Nils Köbis,Nicolas Jacquemet,Marek Vranka,Dan Ariely,Jareef Bin Martuza,Yuval Feldman,Michał Białek,Jan K. Woike,Zoe Rahwan,Alicia Seidl,Eileen Chou,Agne Kajackaite,Simeon Schudy,Ulrich Glogowsky,Anna Z. Czarna,Stefan Pfattheicher,Panagiotis Mitkidis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02009-0
IF: 24.252
2024-10-22
Nature Human Behaviour
Abstract:Dishonest behaviours such as tax evasion impose significant societal costs. Ex ante honesty oaths—commitments to honesty before action—have been proposed as interventions to counteract dishonest behaviour, but the heterogeneity in findings across operationalizations calls their effectiveness into question. We tested 21 honesty oaths (including a baseline oath)—proposed, evaluated and selected by 44 expert researchers—and a no-oath condition in a megastudy involving 21,506 UK and US participants from Prolific.com who played an incentivized tax evasion game online. Of the 21 interventions, 10 significantly improved tax compliance by 4.5 to 8.5 percentage points, with the most successful nearly halving tax evasion. Limited evidence for moderators was found. Experts and laypeople failed to predict the most effective interventions, though experts' predictions were more accurate. In conclusion, honesty oaths were effective in curbing dishonesty, but their effectiveness varied depending on content. These findings can help design impactful interventions to curb dishonesty.
psychology, experimental,neurosciences,multidisciplinary sciences