Abstract:Background. Action measures are commonly used to assess the accuracy of perception. However, actions can be calibrated to any stable perceptual experience because stability affords perceptuo-motor adaptation and prediction. Accuracy at action tasks therefore does not require accurate perception. To illustrate this, we measured dynamic pointing after locomotor adaptation. Method. We adapted participants to altered visual feedback during walking in an immersive panoramic virtual environment. Specifically, we doubled the visual gain of walking for one set of participants and adapted the second set to a normal gain. Following adaptation participants were tested in a dynamic pointing task while walking without visual feedback. That is, they started each trial pointing to an obliquely positioned target in the visual world and then tried to track the stationary (remembered) target with their hand while walking with eyes closed. Results. Participants adapted to a normal gain tracked the egocentric location of the targets relatively accurately. However, those adapted to doubled visual gain rotated their hand too rapidly even though they had never practiced pointing in the adapting environment. In contrast, explicit estimates of egocentric distance to similar targets did not differ as a function of adaptation condition, but underestimated egocentric distance in near space by a factor of about 0.75. Evidently adaptation altered spatial updating during locomotion without altering perceived target distance. Conclusions. A great deal of evidence suggests that egocentric distance is misperceived. Locomotor action measures, such as pointing, can be accomplished successfully if spatial updating of egocentric position is calibrated by experience. Thus any misperception of egocentric distance could be masked by such measures. Dynamic pointing tasks are informative about spatial updating, but they are not directly informative about the absolute scaling of perceived space. Actions can be calibrated to successfully reflect perceptuo-motor expectancies even in the presence of inaccurately scaled perceptions.

Being observed magnifies action.

Action and Motivation: Measuring Perception or Strategies?

Being observed detrimentally affects face perception

Social Constraints from an Observer's Perspective: Coordinated Actions Make an Agent's Position More Predictable.

Money, Moral Transgressions, and Blame

How Do People Construe Objects when Being Observed?

Pointing Accurately at a Target Doesn't Require Perceiving Its Location Accurately

Modulation of the brain activity in outcome evaluation by the presence of an audience: An electrophysiological investigation.

Cognitive impacts of group dynamics: exploring memory errors in observing actions by familiar and unfamiliar individuals

Ostracizers' mark of disgrace: Social exclusion increases the actor–observer difference

Effects of being watched on self-referential processing, self-awareness and prosocial behaviour

Focussing Attention on Oneself Increases the Perception of Being Observed by Others

Perception of being observed by a speaker alters gaze behavior

Does observability amplify sensitivity to moral frames? Evaluating a reputation-based account of moral preferences

Effect Size Magnification: No Variable Is as Important as the One You're Thinking About—While You're Thinking About It

Observation suppresses affective interference effects in high affective focus reaction time tasks

Under watching eyes in news comment sections: effects of audience cue on self-awareness and commenting behaviour

Communicated priors tune the perception of control

The audience eats more if a movie character keeps eating: An unconscious mechanism for media influence on eating behaviors

How the Perceived Cost of Prosocial Action Inspires Observers to Contribute

Being observed increases overimitation in three diverse cultures.