Abstract:The abilities to predict, explain, and control might arise out of operations on a common underlying representation or, conversely, from independent cognitive processes. We developed a novel experimental paradigm to explore how individuals might use probabilistic mental models in these three tasks, under varying levels of complexity and uncertainty. Participants interacted with a simple chatbot defined by a finite-state machine, and were then tested on their ability to predict, explain, and control the chatbot's responses. When full information was available, performance varied significantly across the tasks, with control proving most robust to increased complexity, and explanation being the most challenging. In the presence of hidden information, however, performance across tasks equalized, and participants demonstrated an alternative neglect bias, i.e., a tendency to ignore less likely possibilities. A second, within-subject experimental design then looked for correlations between abilities. We did not find strong correlations, but the challenges of the task for the subjects limited our statistical power. To understand these effects better, a final experiment investigated the possibility of cross-training, skill transfer, or "zero-shot" performance: how well a participant, explicitly trained on one of the three tasks, could perform on the others without additional training. Here we found strong asymmetries: participants trained to control gained generalizable abilities to both predict and explain, while training on either prediction or explanation did not lead to transfer. This cross-training experiment also revealed correlations in performance; most notably between control and prediction. Our findings highlight the complex role of mental models, in contrast to task-specific heuristics, when information is partially hidden, and suggest new avenues for research into situations where the acquisition of general purpose mental models may provide a unifying explanation for a variety of cognitive abilities.

Communicated priors tune the perception of control

How perception of control shapes decision making

Perceptual Control as a Unifying Concept in Psychology

Social Constraints from an Observer's Perspective: Coordinated Actions Make an Agent's Position More Predictable.

Agency Modulates the Lateral and Medial Prefrontal Cortex Responses in Belief-Based Decision Making

Having control over the external world increases the implicit sense of agency

Does perceptual confidence facilitate cognitive control?

Constraining the Sense of Agency in Human-Machine Interaction

Prime-induced illusion of control: The influence of unconscious priming on self-initiated actions and the role of regression to the mean

"Illusion of control" in Minority and Parrondo Games

Is that what I wanted to do? Cued vocalizations influence the phenomenology of controlling a moving object

The role of the temporoparietal junction in implicit and explicit sense of agency

The phenomenology of controlling a moving object with another person

Taking credit for success: the phenomenology of control in a goal-directed task

Controllability and cause in human collaboration

Biased perception leads to biased action: Validating a Bayesian model of interception

Prediction, Explanation, and Control: The Use of Mental Models in Dynamic Environments

Metacognition bridges experiences and beliefs in sense of agency

Control Limited Perceptual Decision Making

Cultural background influences implicit but not explicit sense of agency for the production of musical tones

The Body Knows Better: Sensorimotor signals reveal the interplay between implicit and explicit Sense of Agency in the human mind