Abstract:Capacity limitations in visual tasks can be observed when the number of task-related objects increases. An influential idea is that such capacity limitations are determined by competition at the neural level: two objects that are encoded by shared neural populations interfere more in behavior (e.g., visual search) than two objects encoded by separate neural populations. However, the neural representational similarity of objects varies across brain regions and across time, raising the question of where and when competition determines task performance. Furthermore, it is unclear whether the association between neural representational similarity and task performance is common or unique across tasks. Here, we used neural representational similarity derived from fMRI, MEG, and deep neural networks (DNN) to predict performance on two visual search tasks involving the same objects and requiring the same responses but differing in instructions: cued visual search and oddball visual search. Separate groups of human participants (both sexes) viewed the individual objects in neuroimaging experiments to establish the neural representational similarity between those objects. Results showed that performance on both search tasks could be predicted by neural representational similarity throughout the visual system (fMRI), from 80 msec after onset (MEG), and in all DNN layers. Stepwise regression analysis, however, revealed task-specific associations, with unique variability in oddball search performance predicted by early/posterior neural similarity, and unique variability in cued search task performance predicted by late/anterior neural similarity. These results reveal that capacity limitations in superficially similar visual search tasks may reflect competition at different stages of visual processing. Significance Statement Visual search for target objects is slowed down by the presence of distractors, but not all distractors are equally distracting – the more similar a distractor is to the target, the more it slows down search. Here, we used fMRI, MEG, and a deep neural network to reveal where, when, and how neural similarity between targets and distractors predicts visual search performance across two search tasks: oddball visual search (locating the different-looking object) and cued visual search (locating the cued object). Results also revealed brain regions, time points, and feature levels that predicted task-unique performance. These results provide a neural basis for similarity theories of visual search and show that this neural basis differs across visual search tasks.

The Neural Correlates of Similarity- and Rule-based Generalization

Bridging the Semantic Latent Space Between Brain and Machine: Similarity is All You Need

Domain general frontoparietal regions show modality-dependent coding of auditory and visual rules

The Nature and Neural Correlates of Semantic Association versus Conceptual Similarity

Dissociable Roles of Medial and Lateral PFC in Rule Learning

Predicting cued and oddball visual search performance from fMRI, MEG, and DNN neural representational similarity

The neural implementation of task rule activation in the task-cuing paradigm: an event-related fMRI study.

Predicting cued and oddball visual search performance from neural representational similarity

Object Bias Disrupts Rule-Based Generalization in Adults Across Domains.

Electrophysiological Correlates of Inductive Generalization

The neural basis of the bilateral distribution advantage

Similarity-based fMRI-MEG fusion reveals hierarchical organisation within the brain's semantic system

Different brain potentials evoked at distinct phases of rule learning.

Similarity in evoked responses does not imply similarity in macroscopic network states

Flexible neural representations of abstract structural knowledge in the human Entorhinal Cortex

Functional Neuroanatomy of the Semantic System: Divisible by What?

Neural Pattern Similarity in the Left IFG and Fusiform is Associated with Novel Word Learning

Regional specialization manifests in the reliability of neural population codes

Cortical circuits for cross-modal generalization

Similarities and differences in spatial and non-spatial cognitive maps

Unifying Principles of Generalization: Past, Present, and Future