Abstract:The purpose of the present study was to disentangle the neurocognitive subprocesses underlying different spatial reasoning problems with the event-related potentials technique.Fourteen healthy young Chinese students(6 males and 8 females,mean age 25.2±2.2 years) without history of neurological disorders participated in this study.There were four kinds of three-term spatial reasoning tasks and one kind of memory tasks(baseline,BS).The term orders are AB-CB in all tasks.All stimuli were generated with the Eprime 1.0 software and displayed in black against a white background on a computer screen.EEG was recorded from the scalp through 32 non-polarizable Ag/AgCl sintered electrodes in pre-configured caps,with a 500 Hz sampling rate using the Neuroscan EEG system. The ERP waveforms were time-locked to the onset of premise 2.Mean amplitudes in each time window were analyzed with the three-way repeated-measures analyses of variance.The behavioral results indicated that memory tasks were easier than reasoning tasks except for the absent valid multi-model problems.But both multi-model reasoning tasks were easier than one-model reasoning task.ERP data showed that reasoning tasks elicited more positive amplitudes than baseline tasks from 200ms to 900ms.The content-based spatial reasoning elicited a waveform similar to that of no-content spatial reasoning.One-model problem elicited different waveforms with valid twomodel problems in the time window of 300-600ms.Valid two-model problems elicited different waveform with two model and no-valid problems in the time window of 200-600ms. In conclusion,the behavioral data show that the place of indeterminate premises and the difficulty of spatial problems affected the process of resolving uncertain spatial reasoning.ERP data suggest that spatial reasoning and memory might reflect different requirement of attention resources.When confronted with a two-model problem,people process the stimulus and make a primary decision after 200ms,then the construction of a single mental model with an annotation.Moreover,visual images do not affect significantly spatial reasoning.

Different brain potentials evoked at distinct phases of rule learning.

An Event-related Potential Study of Formal-operation Development in 9 to 11-year-old Children

Syntactic Complexity and Musical Proficiency Modulate Neural Processing of Non-Native Music

Cognitive changes in conjunctive rule-based category learning: An ERP approach

Differences in Neurocognitive Mechanisms Underlying the Processing of Center-Embedded and Non–embedded Musical Structures

Application of Event-Related Potentials in Study on Recognition Memory in Infancy

ERP Characteristics of Inducing Rule Validity in Number Series under Time Pressure

Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited By A Number Discrimination Task

Learning Without Consciously Knowing: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials in Sequence Learning

Multiple mechanisms regulate statistical learning of orthographic regularities in school-age children: Neurophysiological evidence

ERP Evidence for the Involvement of High-Level Brain Mechanisms in Perceptual Learning

An Experimental Study on the Correlation Between the Behavioral Evidences of Sequence Learning and ERP Effects

The Neural Basis of Spatial Reasoning:An Event-related Potential Study

Different systems in human brain are involved in presemantic discrimination of pictures as revealed by event-related potentials.

Electrocortical correlates of attention differentiate individual capacity in associative learning

Initial Learning in the Brain: From Rules to Action

ERP to chess stimuli reveal expert-novice differences in the amplitudes of N2 and P3 components

Topographical Subcomponents of Electrical Brain Activity Allow to Identify Semantic Learning

Neural substrates of data-driven scientific discovery: An fMRI study during performance of number series completion task

Different Contexts in the Oddball Paradigm Induce Distinct Brain Networks in Generating the P300

Involvement of the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Numerical Rule Induction: A Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Study