Abstract:Background: Two characteristics of commonly used outcomes in medical research are zero inflation and non-negative integers; examples include the number of hospital admissions or emergency department visits, where the majority of patients will have zero counts. Zero-inflated regression models were devised to analyze this type of data. However, the performance of zero-inflated regression models or the properties of data best suited for these analyses have not been thoroughly investigated. Methods: We conducted a simulation study to evaluate the performance of two generalized linear models, negative binomial and zero-inflated negative binomial, for analyzing zero-inflated count data. Simulation scenarios assumed a randomized controlled trial design and varied the true underlying distribution, sample size, and rate of zero inflation. We compared the models in terms of bias, mean squared error, and coverage. Additionally, we used logistic regression to determine which data properties are most important for predicting the best-fitting model. Results: We first found that, regardless of the rate of zero inflation, there was little difference between the conventional negative binomial and its zero-inflated counterpart in terms of bias of the marginal treatment group coefficient. Second, even when the outcome was simulated from a zero-inflated distribution, a negative binomial model was favored above its ZI counterpart in terms of the Akaike Information Criterion. Third, the mean and skewness of the non-zero part of the data were stronger predictors of model preference than the percentage of zero counts. These results were not affected by the sample size, which ranged from 60 to 800. Conclusions: We recommend that the rate of zero inflation and overdispersion in the outcome should not be the sole and main justification for choosing zero-inflated regression models. Investigators should also consider other data characteristics when choosing a model for count data. In addition, if the performance of the NB and ZINB regression models is reasonably comparable even with ZI outcomes, we advocate the use of the NB regression model due to its clear and straightforward interpretation of the results.

An application of negative binomial distribution of order k in sensitive surveys

A New Non‐randomized Model for Analysing Sensitive Questions with Binary Outcomes

Aiding the well celebrated Kuk's randomized response technique through auxiliary and prior information

Nonparametric Response-Adaptive Randomization for Continuous Responses

Doubly Adaptive Biased Coin Designs with Delayed Responses

A Simple Algorithm for Estimating Distribution Parameters from $n$-Dimensional Randomized Binary Responses

A Note on a Simple and Practical Randomized Response Framework for Eliciting Sensitive Dichotomous & Quantitative Information

Group sequential designs for negative binomial outcomes

Respondent privacy and estimation efficiency in randomized response surveys for discrete-valued sensitive variables

Nonparametric model-assisted estimation from randomized response survey data

An Optimised Optional Randomised Response Technique

A generalized negative binomial and applications

Application of Beta-Distribution and Combined Uniform and Binomial Methods in Longitudinal Modeling of Bounded Outcome Score Data

On the dependable level of the negative survey

Robust Designs for Prospective Randomized Trials Surveying Sensitive Topics

Design and monitoring of clinical trials with an interim analysis and a negative binomial endpoint

Evaluation of negative binomial and zero-inflated negative binomial models for the analysis of zero-inflated count data: application to the telemedicine for children with medical complexity trial

Group Response-Adaptive Randomization With Delayed and Missing Responses

Accurate inference in negative binomial regression

Chaudhuri and Mukerjee ORRT for two sensitive characteristics and their overlap

Negative binomial-reciprocal inverse Gaussian distribution: Statistical properties with applications