Abstract:Background The differentiation and diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and pre-excited tachycardia (PXT) remains a challenging task, especially when typical AV dissociation is not present. The purpose of this article is to study the feasibility of a new theoretical algorithm for identifying ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and pre-excited arrhythmias (PA) rhythms (which can be used to distinguish VT from PXT, etc.). Method This study involved the deduction of a new algorithm by combining knowledge of cardiac anatomy, vectorcardiography, and cardiac electrophysiology. The new algorithm evaluated the diagnostic value through intracardiac electrophysiology in 205 cases of VA and PA. The new algorithm diagnoses VA based on the following 4-step process: 1. The QRS complex in leads II, III, and aVF shows a unidirectional R wave, and lead aVR shows a QS pattern. 2. S waves are predominant in two or more of leads I, aVF, and V6. 3. Lead V2 shows ≥3 phase waves or returning branch notching (note: returning branch refers to the band of QRS complexes returning to the baseline). 4. Lead V5 shows a negative wave in the initial portion or returning branch notching. If none of these criteria are met, the diagnosis is PA. The diagnostic value of the new algorithm is compared with the Steurer algorithm and the Vereckei algorithm (diagnosed based on the QRS waveform characteristics of the two algorithms during electrophysiological verification, excluding the diagnosis of atrioventricular dissociation). Results The new algorithm showed significant advantages in terms of AUC value (0.83 vs. 0.61 vs. 0.57), sensitivity (83.6 % vs. 23.3 % vs. 24.8 %), and accuracy (82.9 % vs. 48.3 % vs. 46.3 %) compared to the Steurer algorithm and Vereckei algorithm based on QRS waveform characteristics for diagnosing VA (137 cases) and PA (68 cases). This indicates that the new algorithm is more accurate in identifying idiopathic VA. While there was a significant difference in specificity between the New algorithm and Steurer algorithm (82.3 % vs. 98.5 %, p < 0.05), the difference with Vereckei algorithm (82.3 % vs. 89.7 %) was not significant.In the New algorithm, the sensitivity and specificity for each step are as follows: - Step 1: Sensitivity 34.3 %, Specificity 94.1 %. - Step 2: Sensitivity 24.1 %, Specificity 98.5 %. - Step 3: Sensitivity 18.3 %, Specificity 100 %. - Step 4: Sensitivity 6.6 %, Specificity 89.7 %. Step 1 had the highest AUC value, indicating the best overall diagnostic performance among all steps. Step 2 and Step 3 also performed well, while Step 4 had relatively poorer diagnostic performance. Conclusion The new algorithm is suitable for identifying the origin of VA and PA rhythms.

A novel algorithm for ventricular arrhythmia classification using a fuzzy logic approach

Cardiac Arrhythmia Classification Based on 3D Recurrence Plot Analysis and Deep Learning.

Patient-Specific ECG Classification with Integrated Long Short-Term Memory and Convolutional Neural Networks

Automated Heartbeat Classification Exploiting Convolutional Neural Network with Channel-Wise Attention

Ventricular Fibrillation Detection by an Improved Time Domain Algorithm Combined with SVM

Study on the feasibility of distinguishing ventricular and pre-excited arrhythmia rhythms by a new algorithm

A Deep Learning-based Classification Algorithm for the Origin of Premature Ventricular Contractions.

Detection of Ventricular Fibrillation Based on Ballistocardiography by Constructing an Effective Feature Set.

Arrhythmia Classification Based on Multiple Features Fusion and Random Forest Using ECG

Development and validation of warning system of ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with heart failure with heart rate variability data

ECG-Based Heartbeat Classification Using Two-Level Convolutional Neural Network and RR Interval Difference

Optimal Multi-Stage Arrhythmia Classification Approach

Interpatient Heartbeat Classification Using Modified Residual Attention Network with Two-Phase Training and Assistant Decision

Localization of Origins of Premature Ventricular Contraction in the Whole Ventricle Based on Machine Learning and Automatic Beat Recognition from 12-Lead ECG.

[An image classification method for arrhythmias based on Gramian angular summation field and improved Inception-ResNet-v2]

Automated atrial fibrillation and ventricular fibrillation recognition using a multi-angle dual-channel fusion network

False arrhythmia alarm reduction in the intensive care unit using data fusion and machine learning

A "Two-Step Classification" Machine Learning Method for Non-Invasive Localization of Premature Ventricular Contraction Origins Based on 12-Lead ECG.

Prediction of Shock-Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation During Resuscitation of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Artificial Intelligence to Interpret Wide-Complex Tachycardia - Trust the Machine?

A novel interpretable multilevel wavelet decomposition deep network for actual heartbeat classification