Abstract:Background: The promise of real-world evidence and the learning health care system primarily depends on access to high-quality data. Despite widespread awareness of the prevalence and potential impacts of poor data quality (DQ), best practices for its assessment and improvement are unknown. Objective: This review aims to investigate how existing research studies define, assess, and improve the quality of structured real-world health care data. Methods: A systematic literature search of studies in the English language was implemented in the Embase and PubMed databases to select studies that specifically aimed to measure and improve the quality of structured real-world data within any clinical setting. The time frame for the analysis was from January 1945 to June 2023. We standardized DQ concepts according to the Data Management Association (DAMA) DQ framework to enable comparison between studies. After screening and filtering by 2 independent authors, we identified 39 relevant articles reporting DQ improvement initiatives. Results: The studies were characterized by considerable heterogeneity in settings and approaches to DQ assessment and improvement. Affiliated institutions were from 18 different countries and 18 different health domains. DQ assessment methods were largely manual and targeted completeness and 1 other DQ dimension. Use of DQ frameworks was limited to the Weiskopf and Weng (3/6, 50%) or Kahn harmonized model (3/6, 50%). Use of standardized methodologies to design and implement quality improvement was lacking, but mainly included plan-do-study-act (PDSA) or define-measure-analyze-improve-control (DMAIC) cycles. Most studies reported DQ improvements using multiple interventions, which included either DQ reporting and personalized feedback (24/39, 61%), IT-related solutions (21/39, 54%), training (17/39, 44%), improvements in workflows (5/39, 13%), or data cleaning (3/39, 8%). Most studies reported improvements in DQ through a combination of these interventions. Statistical methods were used to determine significance of treatment effect (22/39, 56% times), but only 1 study implemented a randomized controlled study design. Variability in study designs, approaches to delivering interventions, and reporting DQ changes hindered a robust meta-analysis of treatment effects. Conclusions: There is an urgent need for standardized guidelines in DQ improvement research to enable comparison and effective synthesis of lessons learned. Frameworks such as PDSA learning cycles and the DAMA DQ framework can facilitate this unmet need. In addition, DQ improvement studies can also benefit from prioritizing root cause analysis of DQ issues to ensure the most appropriate intervention is implemented, thereby ensuring long-term, sustainable improvement. Despite the rise in DQ improvement studies in the last decade, significant heterogeneity in methodologies and reporting remains a challenge. Adopting standardized frameworks for DQ assessment, analysis, and improvement can enhance the effectiveness, comparability, and generalizability of DQ improvement initiatives.

The data quality improvement plan: deciding on choice and sequence of data quality improvements

Assessing Data Quality Within Available Context

Data Quality-Driven Improvement in Health Care: Systematic Literature Review

One Size Does Not Fit All---A Contingency Approach to Data Governance

Assessing The Practice Of Data Quality Evaluation In A National Clinical Data Research Network Through A Systematic Scoping Review In The Era Of Real-World Data

Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers

Data quality assessment and improvement

Improving data quality control in quality improvement projects

Can big data improve firm decision quality? The role of data quality and data diagnosticity

Minimizing the data quality problem of information systems: A process-based method

Data Quality Improvement Strategies for Data Analysis Specific to the IT Industry

Data Quality Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities

Intrinsic data quality dimensions: expanding on Wand and Wang's data quality model

A Web-Based Tool to Evaluate Data Quality of Reused Health Data Assets

Identifying Data Quality/Information Quality Research: Framework and Evolution

Improving Data Quality During ERP Implementation Based on Information Product Map.

Towards augmented data quality management: Automation of Data Quality Rule Definition in Data Warehouses

Ontology for Data Quality and Chronic Disease Management

Implications and Modelling of Data Quality on Confidence of Clinical Decision Support: A Conceptual Framework

Modeling Information Quality Risk In Data Mining