Abstract:This article analyses Leanne Allison and Jeremy Mendes’ 2012 interactive documentary, Bear 71. Supported by the National Film Board of Canada, Allison and Mendes made use of thousands of hours of National Park crittercams footage of wildlife to inform audiences that, in Banff, ‘bears and humans live closer to each other than any place in the world’. According to Sundance, this multimedia work is a ‘poignant interactive documentary about a bear in the Canadian Rockies [that] illuminates the way humans engage with wildlife in the age of networks, satellites, and digital surveillance’. Although Bear 71 has received no scholarly attention, it explicitly engages concerns that are central to animal studies, interdisciplinary environmental humanities, critical geography, and eco-media studies. The navigable digital environment that the text simulates and produces, represented through GIS technology, the videogame-like interactivity of that space with your own ‘avatar’, and the crittercam access to intimate, everyday animal life, all raise questions about how new media produces knowledge about nature, the role of mapping tools such as Geographic Information Systems and scientific technologies like radio telemetry and crittercams in shaping human–animal relations, and the viability of an environmental ethic that bemoans the loss of nature ‘out there’. Drawing on scholarship about crittercams and wildlife, such as Benson’s Wired Wilderness and Donna Haraway’s Crittercam, and critical animal geography – especially what Sarah Whatmore calls ‘hybrid geography’ – I argue that the film’s use and representation of interactive digital environments reveal the ways that humans and nature are entangled. The film forces us to imagine that we always already live in ‘material-semiotic’ worlds and asks us to consider how ‘the wild and the domestic get swept up in the volatile eddies and flows of socio-technical networks that bring people, living organisms and machines together in new and particular ways’ (Whatmore, 344). The implications for understanding Bear 71 as articulating a hybrid geography demonstrate the contribution of critical eco-media studies to environmental thinking: space is not material, fixed, or objectively knowable; the human and the wild constitute and attenuate each other; and technology is central to – as opposed to corrupting or only mediating – our ability to perceive how we already participate with and within nature.

Invisible Landscapes: Extreme Oil and the Arctic in Experimental Film and Activist Art Practices

Movements beyond human: Ecological aesthetics and knowledges in underwater wildlife documentaries

The Culture Wars of Climate Change

Arctic Futures: The Power of Ideas

A Case Study in Participatory Environmental Art

Arctic environmental governance: challenges of sustainable development

Photography’s Narrative Spaces – Stories About Man-Altered Landscape

Climate Change Totems and Discursive Hegemony Over the Arctic

Visual climate change art 2005–2015: discourse and practice

Undoing art and oil: an environmental tale of sponsorship, cultural justice and climate change controversy

Arctic Stewardship: Maintaining Regional Resilience in an Era of Global Change

Whose everyday climate cultures? Environmental subjectivities and invisibility in climate change discourse

Arctic Ice Changes and Global Warming

Rub trees, crittercams, and GIS: the wired wilderness of Leanne Allison and Jeremy Mendes’ Bear 71

Expanding landscapes: Articulating metamodernity in painting after Land art

The Arctic in World Affairs

Sounding Archives of Presence

Artistic Practices in the Anthropocene

The Arctic in Play: Governance in a Time of Rapid Change

Ecological Dynamics Across the Arctic Associated with Recent Climate Change

Arctic Politics: Conflict and Cooperation in the Circumpolar North