Points of view: a survey of survey courses: are they effective?
Arri Eisen,J. Batzli,David M. Becker,D. Fambrough,Rebecca Pearlman,R. Shingles,Rae Brosnan,M. Ledbetter,A. Campbell
Cell Biology Education
Abstract:Note from the Editors Points of View (POV) addresses issues faced by many people within the life science education community. Cell Biology Education (CBE) publishes the POV Feature to present two or more opinions published in tandem on a common topic. We consider POVs to be ''Op-Ed'' pieces designed to stimulate thought and dialogue on significant educational issues. Each author had the opportunity to revise or add to his/her POV after reading drafts of the other's POV. In this issue, we ask the question, ''Are survey courses still viable for introductory biology?'' The POV question is related to the ones asked by the National Research Council in the recent feature by Jay Labov (www.cellbioed.org/articles/vol3no4/article. cfm?articleID=132) and continues to be a subject of debate by many science departments, not just biology. Often the discussion is split not only by perceived value of the survey course, but also by the size of the institution. Therefore, we present four POVs, plus a framing POV to set the tone. W hat makes a good teacher? What makes a good curriculum? While these two questions are intimately related, they are different. And when I think about them, I find myself feeling like Tevye in Fiddler on the Roof dealing with a perplexing problem—that is, I quickly run out of hands. On the one hand, when I reflect on my best teachers, I can't separate the person from what the person taught me. On the other hand, when designing a curriculum, we want to figure out what to teach and how, and leave out the person, because 1) personnel changes, 2) teachers have different styles, and 3) a good curriculum allows for these different styles. On the other hand, while personal style overlaps with pedagogy— the ''how'' of teaching—they are different. On the other hand.. . I have run out of hands. Let's simplify a little and just discuss key questions and issues that should be addressed in designing a rigorous biology curriculum. Since introductory courses set the tone, standards , and expectations for the curriculum, we'll focus our discussion on introductory courses as a model for thinking about the entire curriculum. Because this is an ''overview'' for a series of Points of View articles (POVs), I can cheat some and not give you any answers (see the four POVs that follow for some possible answers). Instead, I'll sneak into a discussion of these key questions …