Abstract:This paper examines what factors are associated with the 2015 pension reform of Korean civil servant as social innovation. We explore what lessons we can learn from the pension reform in terms of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) model. The ACF model allows us to identify how the substantial reform is, relying on policy knowledge and entrepreneurs, possible in terms of political and social consensus. It also clearly demonstrates the possibility of systematic pension reform at an appropriate level through social learning and policy learning. Through the ACF model, we review how South Korea’s civil servant pension reform act occurred at the end of May 2015. The temporal scope covers from 2009 latest reform, and the 2014’s President administrative policy speech that had strongly been showed her will to reform the pension issue to the end of May 2015 when the reform bill enacted. We investigate each advocacy coalition in order to elucidate the actors that constitute the two coalition groups and to scrutinize whether a policy broker had existed in the process. We also attempt to find the relatively stable parameters and external events that affected the reform and also the belief system that shared by two advocacy coalition group. The result clearly shows that the two coalition groups shared their normative beliefs ultimately, for example, the need to change the current civil servant’s pension system, but, the gap in the numerical change in the policy core belief and secondary belief between the two actors had seemed to be excessively large and uncompromising. A policy broker who can coordinate the interests and interests of stakeholder groups over the government pension reform proposal was desperately needed. Negotiation and leadership of the policy entrepreneurs led to a settlement of the government pension reform proposal at the end of May 2015. Their entrepreneurial activities led to an appropriate level of social consensus on the sustainable reform of pension system through policy knowledge and learning. Further research is required to explore how models of socially innovative forms of governance are created in various pension reforms across various countries. It is also required to examine how policy entrepreneurs use policy knowledge and information for a successful institutional reform through social innovation across various countries.

Inside the Iron Cage: Organizational Political Dynamics and Institutional Changes in Presidential Selection Systems in Korean Universities, 1985-2002

Examining political connections to study institutional change: Evidence from two unexpected election outcomes in South Korea

Political Capital Vs. Constraint: Evidence from CEO Turnovers in Chinese Private Firms

The Structure of Political Institutions and Effectiveness of Corporate Political Lobbying.

The Effect of Political Turnover on Firms' Strategic Change in the Emerging Economies: the Moderating Role of Political Connections and Financial Resources

Democracy and polarization in the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea

Decoupling the Influence on Corporate Political Actions

The influence of the Programme for International Student Assessment on educational governance situated in the institutional setting of South Korea

Globalisation and Institutional Change in the State-Led Model: The Case of Corporate Governance in South Korea

Organizational responses to the marketization of higher education institutions: a comparative case study of South Korea and Hong Kong

Electoral Politics and Old-Age Pension Reform in South Korea

The workings of collaborative governance: Evaluating collaborative community-building initiatives in Korea

Exploring institutional reform of Korean civil service pension: advocacy coalition framework, policy knowledge and social innovation

Insights From The 2022 South Korean Presidential Election: Polarisation, Fractured Politics, Inequality, And Constraints On Power

Women's Labor Movement, State Suppression, and Democratization in South Korea

The Democratic Deficit in South Korea: The 2012 Presidential Election and its Aftermath

In Institutions We Trust? Trust in Government and the Allocation of Entrepreneurial Intentions

Analysis of Digital Governance Transition in South Korea: Focusing on the Leadership of the President for Government Innovation

A Theory of Organizational Dynamics: Internal Politics and Efficiency

The Constitutional Court as a Political Crisis Manager

The balancing act of corporate political activity under institutional pressure