Abstract:While anecdotes suggest that workplace gender disparities widely exist, the current literature on this topic has not provided sufficient causal evidence due to two deficiencies. First, because most gender studies rely on surveys and laboratory experiments, causal evidence of gender disparities in the field is rare; Second, because most empirical gender studies focus on individual workers or C-suite executives, research on low-level managers using real-world personnel data is also rare. In this study, we aim to address these deficiencies by empirically studying the effect of gender on the job assignment of frontline managers in a large sportswear retail chain using personnel, sales, and operational data. Our estimation strategy is a two-step fixed effects panel estimation framework, which 1) separately identifies manager fixed effects and store fixed effects by exploring manager switches across stores; and 2) estimates the effect of gender on store-manager assignment while controlling for the estimated manager fixed effects from the first step. This framework allows us to uncover causal evidence for the existence of gender bias in store-manager assignment—male managers were more likely than their female counterparts to be assigned to stores with higher sales potential, i.e., core stores, stores with a higher sales target, or stores with a larger number of sales clerks. To support this finding, we test three alternative hypotheses. First, we find that male managers achieved similar store sales when replacing their female counterparts in the same stores and vice versa, and male managers were not better at managing the turnover of sales clerks, neither of which supports an alternative hypothesis of differential managerial abilities; Second, we conduct a maximum likelihood estimation of a discrete-time Markov chain that models the processes of store-manager assignment and manager turnover, and do not find evidence to support the hypothesis that the observed gender inequity in store-manager assignment is driven by different gender preferences to leave stores with low sales potential. Third, we find that male sales clerks or male store managers on average made similar individual sales as their female counterparts, thereby not supporting a career selection bias hypothesis that men working at this retailer on average have higher sales abilities than women. Translating our findings into an actionable insight, we develop a gender inequity index (GII) to help organizations measure potential gender bias in job assignment. Applying this index to a simulation study using the retailer’s manager compensation data, we demonstrate the implications of gender-biased job assignment on the gender pay gap.

When Harry Fired Sally: The Double Standard in Punishing Misconduct

Board Gender Diversity and Cost of Equity: Evidence from Mandatory Female Board Representation

Pay Disparity In Multinational And Domestic Firms In China: The Role Of Pro-Disparity Norm

Gender discrimination and the backlash effect in recruitment and dismissal processes: experimental evidence from Slovakia

Individual Investors’ Trading Behavior and Gender Difference in Tolerance of Sex Crimes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Whose misbehavior is inexcusable—And which one? Job‐related discrimination against ethnic minority and majority women

Gender Discrimination? Evidence from the Belgian Public Accounting Profession

Salary History and Employer Demand: Evidence from a Two-Sided Audit

Giving Women the Benefit of the Doubt? Examining Gender Differences in Schools' Management of Sexual Allegations Against Employees

Double Jeopardy?: The Interaction of Gender and Race on Earnings in the United States

Gender diversity and earnings management: the case of female directors with financial background

Effect of employee gender and behavioral style on the evaluations of male and female banking executives.

Accounting for the Gap: A Firm Study Manipulating Organizational Accountability and Transparency in Pay Decisions

Gender composition predicts gender bias: A meta-reanalysis of hiring discrimination audit experiments

Restricting Pay Gap Backfires: The Case of Bank Misconduct

Why Do Women Struggle to Climb the Corporate Ladder? Evidence from Retail Frontline Managers

Disciplinary Sanctions for Police Misconduct: An Empirical Analysis of Sanction Severity

Gender Discrimination in Hiring: Evidence from a Cross-National Harmonized Field Experiment

The Driver of Workplace Alienation or the Cost of Effective Stewardship? The Consequences of Wage Gap for Corporate Performance

A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.

Perpetuating wage inequality: evidence from salary history bans