Abstract:VR/AR eyewear displays are truly here in 2018, but the challenge remains. One of the potential benefits of VR/AR applications is the immersive experience with the virtual world that can suspend disbelief. However, the drawback is that the technology still needs improvement. Currently, most commercially available VR displays may only output 10‐20 ppd (pixel per degree) in angular resolution due to the limitation of the microdisplays. However, our human eye can dissolve the image details up over 60 ppd. Thus, the lack in image resolution can easily lose its capability of fooling the user. In order to improve the design such as the microdisplay panel or imaging optics, we need to evaluate the characteristics of the virtual images in the visual aspect. In conventional display measurement, pixel angular resolution is applied, but the pixel number is only a physical definition. Additionally, for a small pixel structure, it may have high spot luminance and low average image luminance which would cause an uncomfortable stimulus to the user.Therefore, what is a better way to define image resolution in VR/AR displays? In this work, we reviewed the current methods proposed in IEC TC110 on image quality. Then, some of the key factors that involve the image resolution measurement would be presented. We first reviewed the fundamental aspects of visual‐spatial perception and the mechanism of the human eye, and then we explained why such display limits the image quality of VR/AR display systems. In addition, we presented other measurement parameters including the newly proposed term ‐ pixel angular density, MTF (modulation transfer function) as well as the virtual image quality in static and moving picture conditions. These parameters were addressed in this work from introducing the definition to how and why they are necessary to test. An example of measurement in static picture resolution is shown in Figure1. The contrast modulation measurement is performed to determine static picture resolution. The test patterns and the calculation formula are critical in the measurement. The goal of this work is to provide some essential and fundamental guidelines to manufactures and engineers in the image resolution measurement of VR/AR systems.An example of contrast modulation measurementfigure

Beyond the Limits of Visual Acuity: The Real Reason for 4K and 8K Image Resolution

Beyond 4K: Can We Actually Tell Stories in Motion Pictures and Television in 8K?

Resolution limit of the eye: how many pixels can we see?

Quality of 8K Ultra-High-Definition Television Viewing Experience in Practical Viewing Conditions

4-K-resolution Minimalist Optical System Design Based on Deep Learning.

53.2: Invited Paper: Current IEC Standardization on Evaluating Image Resolution in VR/AR Displays

Perspectives on the Definition of Visually Lossless Quality for Mobile and Large Format Displays

Measuring Virtual Reality Headset Resolution and Field of View: Implications for Vision Care Applications

Impact of High-Tech Image Formats Based on Full-Frame Sensors on Visual Experience and Film-Television Production

Foveated Light-Field Display and Real-Time Rendering for Virtual Reality

Temporal Resolution Multiplexing: Exploiting the limitations of spatio-temporal vision for more efficient VR rendering

Distance v.s. Resolution: Neuromapping of Effective Resolution onto Physical Distance

Distinguish True Or False 4k Resolution Using Frequency Domain Analysis And Free-Energy Modelling

Foveated Rendering: Motivation, Taxonomy, and Research Directions

Perceptual Quality Assessment of Immersive Images Considering Peripheral Vision Impact

Apparent Resolution Enhancement for Near-Eye Light Field Display

Increasing Image Resolution on Portable Displays by Subpixel Rendering – a Systematic Overview

Evolution of Resolution in Film Scanners

8K Extremely-High-Resolution Camera Systems