Abstract:The projection displays which use lasers or laser hybrids as light sources have been widely applied in offices, homes, and theaters. The optical performance has been more enhanced recently with the development of the technologies, especially in light enhancement, color reproduction, luminance contrast, and dynamic range. The characterization and measurement for these projection displays become very important. The full‐frame projection technologies such as digital micromirror devices (DMDs), liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS), and liquid crystal display (LCD) projectors are typically concerned in the international standardization. The image quality of the projection system in graphics and video reproduction has been discussed in IEC WG10 “Working group of Laser Displays.“ In recent years, the IS (international standard)‐ IEC62906‐5‐1 Laser display and devices Part 5‐1 Measurement of Optical Performance for Laser Front Projection has been developed and reached the CDV stage. However, at this stage, there are some discussions among the expert’s group on the issues of the optical measurement method. The main issues are the two topics related to the CLO (Color Light Output) and CGV (Color Gamut Volume). There are two opposing views within the working group which is a very challenging topic. According to IEC/ISO rule, the consensus is difficult to be achieved for more 2/3 favor support and less 1/4 against. In the traditional projectors, due to the graphic display is mainly used for black and white usage in the office application, the luminous flux output of the full white field was used as the primary indicator in the specification of the standard product. The light output is directly dependent on the power of the projection source. Therefore, a white light enhancement method is employed in some projection display technologies, and in such cases, the brightness of a color display is often lacking. However, this is no longer the general case. Manufacturer use different ways to boost the white lumen value for the full white screen, but the saturated colors do not get the same boost in brightness. The lumen ratio between the full white and the colors is no longer maintained. In the new standard we recommend using a regional grid pattern to test the projector's light output, including white light output and color light output. Set of four colour tile test patterns used for projector characterization figure Moreover, the argue for color volume method is the derivative from the CLO/WLO issue. The main point is the argument between the applicability of CGV method (CIELAB usage) in HDR/SDR conditions. In this paper, we reviewed some of the most important aspects to provide a basic understanding the current development of laser projection display measurement in IEC standardization. Example of range in colors produced by a given display as represented by the CIELAB color space figure

53.2: Invited Paper: Current IEC Standardization on Evaluating Image Resolution in VR/AR Displays

The Investigation of Data Voxelization for a Three-Dimensional Volumetric Display System

Challenges of spatial 3D display techniques to optoelectronics

53.3: Invited Paper: an Overview of International Standardization for Image Quality of AR Displays

38‐2: Invited Paper: Evaluating Optical Performance and Image Quality in Augmented Reality Eyewear: Standardization, Challenges, and Measurement Methods

Measuring and qualifying optical performance of AR/VR/MR device displays and addressing the unique visual requirements of transparent AR/MR displays

56.2: Invited Paper: Evaluation of Optical See‐through Real Scene Image Quality in AR Eyewear Displays

Omnidirectional Virtual Visual Acuity: A User-Centric Visual Clarity Metric for Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Displays and Environments

38‐3: Redefine Display User Metrics and Measurements in VR/AR with a User‐Experience‐Driven Approach

P‐87: A Novel Method for Measuring Optical Performance of AR/VR Displays

Study of 3D Virtual Reality Picture Quality

Quantifying the optical and rendering pipeline contributions to spatial resolution in augmented reality displays

Image Quality Evaluation Method and System for Head-Mounted Three-Dimensional Display

P‐58: Measurement of AR Displays in Positioning Accuracy

Perceptual Quality Assessment of Immersive Images Considering Peripheral Vision Impact

Foveated Light-Field Display and Real-Time Rendering for Virtual Reality

Measuring Virtual Reality Headset Resolution and Field of View: Implications for Vision Care Applications

Modeling the Impact of Spatial Resolutions on Perceptual Quality of Immersive Image/video.

28.1: <i>Invited Paper:</i> What’s the Focus of Debate in IEC Standardization for the Measurement of Laser Projection Displays?

Optimizing microdisplay requirements for pancake VR applications

Objective Image Quality Optimization in Augmented Reality Using Spatial Frequency Domain Models