Abstract:Background Photon‐counting CT (PCCT) is the next‐generation CT scanner that enables improved spatial resolution and spectral imaging. For full spectral processing, higher tube voltages compared to conventional CT are necessary to achieve the required spectral separation. This generated interest in the potential influence of thin slice high tube voltage PCCT on overall image quality and consequently on radiation dose. Purpose This study first evaluated tube voltages and radiation doses applied in patients who underwent coronary CT angiography with PCCT and energy‐integrating detector CT (EID‐CT). Next, image quality of PCCT and EID‐CT was objectively evaluated in a phantom study simulating different patient sizes at these tube voltages and radiation doses. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical doses of patients scanned on a conventional and PCCT system. Average patient water equivalent diameters for different tube voltages were extracted from the dose reports for both EID‐CT and PCCT. A conical phantom made of polyethylene with multiple diameters (26/31/36 cm) representing different patient sizes and containing an iodine insert was scanned with a EID‐CT scanner using tube voltages and phantom diameters that match the patient scans and characteristics. Next, phantom scans were made with PCCT at a fixed tube voltage of 120 kV and with CTDIVOL values and phantom diameters identical to the EID‐CT scans. Clinical image reconstructions at 0.6 mm slice thickness for conventional CT were compared to PCCT images with 0.4 mm slice thickness. Image quality was quantified using the detectability index (d′), which estimated the visibility of a 3 mm diameter contrast‐enhanced coronary artery by considering noise, contrast, resolution, and human visual perception. Alongside d′, noise, contrast and resolution were also individually assessed. In addition, the influence of various kernels (Bv40/Bv44/Bv48/Bv56), quantum iterative reconstruction strengths (QIR, 3/4) and monoenergetic levels (40/45/50/55 keV) for PCCT on d′ was investigated. Results In this study, 143 patients were included: 47 were scanned on PCCT (120 kV) and the remaining on EID‐CT (74 small‐sized at 70 kV, 18 medium‐sized at 80 kV and four large‐sized at 90 kV). EID‐CT showed 7%–17% higher d′ than PCCT with Bv40 kernel and strength four for small/medium patients. Lower monoenergetic images (40 keV) helped mitigate the difference to 1%–6%. For large patients, PCCT's detectability was up to 31% higher than EID‐CT. PCCT has thinner slices but similar noise levels for similar reconstruction parameters. The noise increased with lower keV levels in PCCT (≈30% increase), but higher QIR strengths reduced noise. PCCT's iodine contrast was stable across patient sizes, while EID‐CT had 33% less contrast in large patients than in small‐sized patients. Conclusion At 120 kV, thin slice PCCT enables CCTA in phantom scans representing large patients without raising radiation dose or affecting vessel detectability. However, higher doses are needed for small and medium‐sized patients to obtain a similar image quality as in EID‐CT. The alternative of using lower mono‐energetic levels requires further evaluation in clinical practice.

Impact of model-based iterative reconstruction on low-contrast lesion detection and image quality in abdominal CT: a 12-reader-based comparative phantom study with filtered back projection at different tube voltages

Abdominal CT: Comparison of Adaptive Statistical Iterative and Filtered Back Projection Reconstruction Techniques

Image quality in CT thorax: effect of altering reconstruction algorithm and tube load

Performance of three model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms using a CT task-based image quality metric

Iterative CT reconstruction in abdominal low-dose CT used for hybrid SPECT-CT applications: effect on image quality, image noise, detectability, and reader’s confidence

The Value of the Model Based Iterative Reconstruction to Improve the Quality of Abdominal CT Images

Thin slice photon‐counting CT coronary angiography compared to conventional CT: Objective image quality and clinical radiation dose assessment

Feasibility of Low-Dose and Low-Contrast Media Volume Approach in Computed Tomography Cardiovascular Imaging Reconstructed with Model-Based Algorithm

Abdominal image quality and dose reduction with energy-integrating or photon-counting detectors dual-source CT: A phantom study

Iterative model reconstruction: Improved image quality of low-tube-voltage prospective ECG-gated coronary CT angiography images at 256-slice CT

Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in a phantom study

Influence of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D algorithm on the detectability of low-contrast lesions and radiation dose repeatability in abdominal computed tomography: a phantom study

Deep Learning Image Reconstruction for Low-Kiloelectron Volt Virtual Monoenergetic Images in Abdominal Dual-Energy CT: Medium Strength Provides Higher Lesion Conspicuity

Improving Lesion Conspicuity in Abdominal Dual-Energy CT with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction: a Prospective Study with Five Readers

The effect of a pre-reconstruction process in a filtered back projection reconstruction on an image quality of a low tube voltage computed tomography

Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithms in Low-Dose Radiation Abdominal Computed Tomography: Assessment of Image Quality and Lesion Diagnostic Confidence

Reduced-Dose Low-Voltage Chest CT Angiography with Sinogram-affirmed Iterative Reconstruction versus Standard-Dose Filtered Back Projection

Feasibility Study of Iterative Model Reconstruction Combined with Low Tube Voltage, Low Iodine Load, and Low Iodine Delivery Rate in Craniocervical CT Angiography.

Effect of Karl iterative reconstruction technique for chest CT image quality

A Phantom Study Comparing Low-Dose CT Physical Image Quality from Five Different CT Scanners

Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality and lesion visibility in renal computed tomography at different doses