Abstract:Culture and class remain contested terrains in policy narratives about the right of the urban poor to access health and social services delivery systems under welfare reform. An urban bioethics agenda is needed to address these dilemmas that have arisen in the context of PRWORA and had an impact on access to health and social services in the urban environment.2;18 Such efforts, however, must address the intellectual framing of the urban poor, as well as the public policies that inscribe deterministic and stereotypical ideas about the poor alongside incomplete portraits of barriers to greater social and occupational mobility. The focus of social science researchers on the delineation of behavioral characteristics among an urban “underclass” in some instances further marginalizes and stigmatizes an already isolated urban poor. Even though Wilson, the Harvard sociologist who popularized the term “underclass” in his earlier research, has now largely disowned it, tales and stories a bound in the social policy and health literature. The media also commonly underscore perceptions that establish rumor as social science and promote stereotypes that the poor are lazy and unwilling to work. Wilson, who has analyzed contextual and neighborhood factors such as the migration of jobs to the suburbs, has also declared stance that is in opposition to those, such as New York University political science professor Lawrence Mead, who embrace a “culture of poverty” thesis and have set the tone for some welfare reform initiatives by arguing that behavior, and not joblessness, is the key, “My guess,” Mead stated after welfare reform was enacted in 1996, ”is that culture came first, and drove away the economy or the good jobs, rather than the other way around,” 21(p3)These statements continue to have dramatic impacts on the stigmas attached to public programs by promoting the idea that those in spatially concentrated radical and ethnic groups in urban areas are not members of the working class. Such perceptions have also contributed to a belief that those who participate in publicly subsidized social welfare and health insurance programs do not work. Whether one accepts that the denial of health care to citizens and noncitizens in contemporary America derives in large part from the promotion of images of the poor as pathological, states have moved steadily to institute a variety of policies under welfare reform that continue to prescribe narrower eligibility criteria for access to service delivery systems. This is occurring as the US Congress hesitates to restore excluded populations, and there are reports of questionable practices targeted at those who are eligible based on current legislation. On several occasions, for example, the Civil Rights Division of the US Department of Health and Human Services has made inquiries (and issued sanctions) in cases for which state and local governments have discriminated against potential Medicaid and TANF applicants by ignoring regulations that stipulate that applications be delivered to applicants on request in a timely manner.3 While it is the explicit responsibility under welfare reform of the US Congress to pass legislation restoring eligibility to excluded populations, an urban bioethics agenda framed in a historical context has much to offer prevailing policy discourses. If, as political theorist Stone notes, a policy alternative is to be judged “by the company that it keeps,” then urban bioethicists can offer human rights paradigms and additional policy alternatives based an assessments of earlier historical experiences of stigmatization that embodied similar forms of evil.23

The Ambulance: Toward a Labor Theory of Poverty Governance

Homeless Clients' Circulation in Emergency Care: Rethinking Poverty Governance as Urban Impasse

Complaint-Oriented Policing: Regulating Homelessness in Public Space

A community-based ambulance model: lessons for emergency medical services and everyday health systems resilience from South Africa

Poverty and population health - The need for A Paradigm shift to capture the working poor and better inform public health planning

Common hierarchies, varied rules - the problem of governing community first responders in prehospital care for quality standards: documentary discourse analysis

Governance and legal considerations supporting prehospital emergency care in low and middle-income countries—For the Special Series on Prehospital Care in LMICs

Toward Disorganized Governance in Public Service Provision? The Case of German Sickness Funds

Going Above and Beyond: Bridging the Gap Between Equitable Outcomes and Procedural Fairness in Health Policy Administration

Ambulance use for ‘primary care’ problems: an ethnographic study of seeking and providing help in a UK ambulance service

Building integrated, adaptive and responsive healthcare systems - lessons from paramedicine in Ontario, Canada

The policy case for designating EMS teams for vulnerable patient populations: Evidence from an intervention in Boston

Cruel optimism, affective governmentality and frontline poverty governance: 'You can promise the world'

How Street-Level Bureaucrats Collaborate for Policy Entrepreneurship: Insights from Anti-Poverty Policy Implementation in China

Paramedics, poetry, and film: health policy and systems research at the intersection of theory, art, and practice

The struggle over the character of social services: conceptualising hybridity and power

A Conceptual Framework for Optimizing the Equity of Hospital-Based Emergency Care: The Structure of Hospital Transfer Networks

Designing and Governing Responsive Local Care Systems - Insights from a Scoping Review of Paramedics in Integrated Models of Care

Public Sector Governance Reform and the Motivation of Street‐Level Bureaucrats in Developing Countries

Organized abandonment under racial capitalism: Measuring accountable actors of structural racism for public health research and action

Culture, class, and service delivery: the politics of welfare reform and an urban bioethics agenda