Abstract:Rapid urbanization in China has led to the increasing scarcity of land suitable and available for construction. Concurrently, rural depopulation has resulted in many vacant properties, including farmhouses and buildings. In order to address this issue, a national land transfer policy has been implemented since the early 2000s in which vacant rural properties are returned to agriculture in return for similar areas of peri-urban land being released for construction. While there have been many different approaches to policy implementation, most commentators agree that successful schemes are characterized by the involvement of local people. As yet, however, there has been little research into how such local collective action is organized, and whether it is really possible to address top-down policies through local, bottom-up, action. Based on a case study of the earliest pilot program in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, we seek to demonstrate that the top-down nature of China’s land transfer policy does not mean that it is necessarily best implemented in a top-down manner. Indeed, we suggest that effective collective action is crucial to the realization of such policies. In particular, the case study indicates that with the empowerment of villagers to participate in the policy process it is possible to achieve a broad consensus on the best approach to addressing the problems, with community interests protected and properly monitoring. In offering a new way of understanding collective action, we conclude that even in cases where a top-down approach is imposed, communities can be empowered to act collectively in implementing the policy from the bottom-up.

How Street-Level Bureaucrats Collaborate for Policy Entrepreneurship: Insights from Anti-Poverty Policy Implementation in China

Street‐level bureaucrats as policy entrepreneurs: Action strategies for flexible community governance in China

The Multilevel Politics of Government–Business Collaboration in China's Rural Poverty Alleviation

Do visiting monks give better sermons? “Street‐level bureaucrats from higher‐up” in targeted poverty alleviation in China

The Micro Administrative Mechanism of Land Reallocation in Land Consolidation: A Perspective from Collective Action

Implementing targeted poverty alleviation: a policy implementation typology

Intense Monitoring and Bureaucratic Support for an Anti-poverty Campaign in China

Enlisting Citizens: Forging the Effectiveness of Policy Implementation in Local China

Street-Level Bureaucracy and the Over-Standardization of Policy Implementation: An Analysis of Urban Management through the Destruction of Merchant Couplets

From the Bottom-Up: Probing the Gap Between Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Intentions of Engaging in Policy Entrepreneurship and Their Behavior

Making collective policy entrepreneurship work: the case of China’s post-disaster reconstruction

Politicalized empowered learning and complex policy implementation: Targeted poverty alleviation in China's county governments

Adaptive Social Mobilization in Grassroots Policy Implementation: Administrative Control and Multiple Participation

Targeted Poverty Alleviation in China: A Typology of Official–Household Relations

Collective Action in Implementing Top-Down Land Policy: the Case of Chengdu, China

How Intermediate Government Facilitates Top-Down Policy Experimentation: Empirical Insights from Rural Land Marketization in Shanghai

Cross-departmental Collaboration Within the Government in China: the Case of Shanghai

How policy entrepreneurship training affects policy entrepreneurship behavior among street-level bureaucrats – a randomized field experiment

Managed Campaign and Bureaucratic Institutions in China: Evidence from the Targeted Poverty Alleviation Program

Developing collaboration between research-oriented and practice-oriented experts in public administration: How does expert participation make a difference in public policy making and governance practice?

From stewards to agents? Intergovernmental management of public-nonprofit partnerships in China