The O‐PLS methodology for orthogonal signal correction—is it correcting or confusing?

Ulf G. Indahl
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.2884
IF: 2.5
2017-04-11
Journal of Chemometrics
Abstract:<section class="article-section article-section__abstract" lang="en" data-lang="en" id="section-1-en"> <h3 class="article-section__header main main">Abstract</h3> <div class="article-section__content en main"> <p>The separation of predictive and nonpredictive (or orthogonal) information in linear regression problems is considered to be an important issue in chemometrics. Approaches including net analyte preprocessing methods and various orthogonal signal correction (OSC) methods have been studied in a considerable number of publications. In the present paper, we focus on the simplest single response versions of some of the early OSC approaches including Fearns OSC, the orthogonal projections to latent structures, the target projection (TP), and the projections to latent structures (PLS) postprocessing by similarity transformation. These methods are claimed to yield improved model building and interpretation alternatives compared with ordinary PLS, by filtering “off” the response‐orthogonal parts of the samples in a dataset. We point out at some fundamental misconceptions that were made in the justification of the PLS‐related OSC algorithms and explain the key properties of the resulting modelling. </p>
chemistry, analytical,instruments & instrumentation,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,automation & control systems,computer science, artificial intelligence,statistics & probability
What problem does this paper attempt to address?